|
|
|
American
Anthropologist
1928
Blom, Frans. Gaspar
Antionio Chi, Interpreter, American
Anthropologist. 1928. Vol. 30:250-261.
Gaspar Antionio Chi was an educated, indigenous Yucatan Indian versed
in several languages: Spanish, Aztec, Latin, and his native tongue. It
is also believed that as he was a descendent of royalty, he also could
understand and write Mayan hieroglyphs. He lived in Merida,
in Yucatan, between the years 1579-1581,
at which time King Charles V of Spain was
interested in gathering information relating to the history, geography,
and culture of his American colonies. Many colonists were unable or uninterested
in writing responses to the questionnaires the king sent them, so often
they hired Gaspar Antonio to fill out these papers for them. While filling
out these questionnaires, Gaspar Antonio would relate his own personal
views to the king about the way things have changed for the worse since
the Spanish arrived. Several of these questionnaires have been found
and are a wealth of information about post-colonial America as well as on this interesting
interpreter.
Much of the article relates the family history of this man, told to
us by various historical documents. He grew up in the district of Tutul
Xiu, was the grandson of Ah Napot Xiu, and the son of Ah Kin Chi. These
two men were of royal blood and were killed by a rival tribe during a
supposed peace meeting. The Spanish were able to capitalize on the hatred
Gaspar Antonio had for this rival tribe by aligning themselves with him.
Gaspar obtained revenge by talking the rival tribe into admitting the
Spanish into their lands. The Spanish consequently conquered the area
for Spain. He, then 17 years of age,
became the charge of Spanish missionaries where he learned Spanish and
Latin. He then became an interpreter and friend to the Spanish, receiving
a 200 peso grant for his pains.
This article relates the life of Gaspar Antonio Chi to share information
about pre- and post-colonial America.
He uses historical documents to prove his analysis, believed to be taken
from the time and place his analysis is set.
CLARITY: 4
NATALIE WHITTAKER Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley).
Blom, Francis. Gaspar Antonio Chi, Interpreter. American Anthropologist 1928 Vol. 30: 250-262.
Francis Blom takes an ethnohistorical approach in offering a biography
of Gaspar Antonio Chi, an interpreter for the Spanish during the early
years of the New World conquest. Blom
utilizes historical data in the role of “informant,” and provides a
glimpse into the anthropology of colonialism. By examining several
historical
documents, Blom proposes that he was an important figure in the early
colonial period of the Yucatan, and played
a major role in the political and social environment of the time.
Blom stumbled upon Chi while examining documents form the provincial
governments, answering questions posed by the Spanish King. King Charles
V circulated these questionnaires in an attempt to assess the climate of his newest possession, New
Spain. While studying the answers to the King’s questions,
Blom noticed that the same person answered many of the questions. This
led him on a search for the source of the information, and culminated
with his discovery of Chi, a Mayan interpreter for the Spanish officials.
A thorough search of the historical documents revealed several mentions
of Chi in the text. Gaspar Antonio was a descendant of the Xiu family,
the rulers of the Mayan lands near the Spanish town of Merida in Yucatan.
The rival Cocom people reportedly killed Chi’s grandfather, the Tutul
Xiu, and his father, Ah Kin Chi, after a prolonged battle to resist
Spanish occupation of their lands. When the Spanish returned, the rulers
sided
with the Spanish and encouraged the people of Mani, the Xiu capital,
to learn the Spanish language and become educated. Gaspar Antonio took
advantage of this opportunity to become proficient in both Spanish
and Latin, according to the contemporary historian Bishop Landa. Landa
took
the young Gaspar Antonio under his wing, educating him in the traditions
of Spain. As Chi matured, he utilized
his skill in both Spanish and Mayan to interpret for his people in the
courts, as well as serving as a mediator between the Spanish officials
and the indigenous Mayans until his death in 1591.
Blom relied heavily on texts originating from Landa and his contemporary
historians. This methodology uncovered limited information, allowing
one to draw conclusions that may or may not be historically accurate.
The Xiu family tree was another source of information, which Blom
admited was probably inflated since it was written after the Spanish
conquest.
While it is obvious that much historical research went into this
treatise, a more thorough examination of the documents may provide more
evidence
to support Blom’s conclusions about the mysterious figure, Gaspar
Antonio Chi.
CLARITY: 4
CINDY CARTER University of Southern
Mississippi (Jeff
Kaufmann)
Clements, Forrest E. Quantitative Method
in Ethnography. American Anthropologist 1928 N.S., Vol. 30.p295-310.
Forrest Clements writes this article in support of a previous paper
he co-authored, which presented statistical methods used to examine possible
relationships between six areas in the Polynesian Islands.
The earlier submission was a paper entitled "A New Objective Method
for Showing Special Relationships," which Clements published along
with S.M Schenk and T.K Brown and submitted to the American Anthropologist
in 1926. The objective in this latest article is twofold: the author
wishes to further detail what he calls "the more ideal of fundamental
aspects of the application of this statistical procedure" (295),
and he also writes to defend his earlier work against the criticism
it received from W.D. Wallis.
The author outlines four main points that he says are pertinent to understanding
the application of this statistical method. First of all, this method
is useful only in showing the evidence for, (or the absence of), relationships
between sub-areas within relatively homogeneous cultures. It is also
dependent on using representative samples of cultural wholes from each
sub-area being compared. All of these traits must become reduced to their
simplest units, which automatically weight complex or generic traits.
And finally, he clarifies that derived correlations will only show the
degree of positive or negative relationships that may exist between the
culture areas being examined.
In the paper "Probability and the Diffusion of Culture Traits",
Wallis took issue with the objectivity of their methods and with the
conclusions they derived from this study. The author’s response to this
entails a definition of objectivity. He says that if data can "as
far as possible rule out the errors due to individual variability in
subjective attitude" (290), then a study will have achieved the
highest level of objectivity possible without ever having ‘complete’ data.
He posits that this is in fact what their study has done. To defend
the conclusions he and his colleagues derived from their work, the
author
explains that the earlier article that presented this study had specifically
stated that the information they were drawing on was incomplete. In
addition, Clements adds that interpreting data is a subjective process
and does
not necessarily reflect a flawed methodology.
CLARITY RATING: 4
BRONWEN SWEENEY: University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
.gif)
Clemmens, Forrest E. Quantitative Method in Ethnography. American Anthropologist, 1928, vol. 30:
p. 295-310.
Quantitative methods in ethnography are discussed as a valuable tool
for conducting research within cultures. Clemmens
outlines the requirements for using the quantitative method appropriately
based on his use of the method during his ethnographic work. The
sample should include a range of traits, selected randomly to avoid bias. When studying similarities between cultures
based on this data, there are two ways to analyze the information. One way is to say the traits arose independently,
which is very unlikely. The other
way is to consider the possibility of a historical connection between
the groups.
Correlation is another important factor in this method. The main point is that positive or negative
correlation do not directly imply a direct causality but rather that
there may be a connection between the two factors. The
quantitative method is meant to draw general inferences about trends
within a culture. It can also
show that some traits within a culture may have diffused into another
culture over time or may have had little effect on the culture.
The statistical method shows positive and negative correlations between
entire cultures. Specific details
and traits within a culture are not considered the focal point of the
data because all traits in the study are treated equally. This is because
it is difficult to determine which traits, if any, should be given greater
consideration.
The quantitative method is designed to show a relationship or non-relationship
between groups in a culture. Also
the traits studied should be representative of the culture as a whole. All
areas of a culture should be equally represented to produce accurate
results. It is also imperative that the traits be
reduced to simplest units which will then automatically factor in specific
details. A trait such as burial practice would be studied according
to the "tree burial" style rather than "arms extended" or "arms
wrapped".
The statistical method and correlation may show historical connections
between groups. They can also
objectively show that certain areas of a culture may be similar or different. It is important to remember that correlation
and the quatititative method do not directly imply that there is a direct
relationship between two factors. It
only points out the trend. Additional
analysis may be necessary to determine the extent of a relationship.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
ETHEL TOVAR. Brigham Young University (Julie Hartley)
Conzemius, Eduard. Ethnographical Notes on
the Black Carib (Garif). American Anthropologist April-June, 1928
Vol. 30 (2): 183-205.
Eduard Conzemius basically wrote an ethnography of the Carib and condensed
it to twenty pages. His apparent goal is to chronicle the culture and
history of this ethnicity.
The Carib, or Garifuna as they call themselves, are a people
found along the Caribbean Coast of Central America. The name Carib, stemming
from cannibal, was given to them by the Spaniards, who thought they ate
human flesh. They were a warlike tribe who inhabited the island of St. Vincent,
from which the British government deported them in 1796. Following this,
they relocated to the aforementioned coast. There are also some that
live in the West Indies, called the "Island Carib," who
are nearing extinction. The Central American Carib had an estimated
population of 20,000 to 25,000, which is increasing despite the fact
that they seldom
intermarry with other races.
There is much to note about their culture. Caribales, Carib villages,
are always found within close proximity to the sea. The houses are
neat and clean. The walls are made of palmwood or mud and the floor is
made
of leveled mud. Beds are reserved for the married and the others use
hammocks. Physically speaking, the Carib are somewhat short in stature
and muscular. They walk around barefoot. The men wear hats fashioned
from palm leaves and the women wear a large neckerchief around their
neck. Music is one of their favorite pastimes and they have made instruments
out of various items such as reed, bones, gourds, and conchs. Singing
and dancing usually accompany the music. Every Christmas and New Year’s
they celebrate their Carnival, in which masked dancers parade around
the streets in gaudy attire and all the children follow them. With
the death of a relative, the women cut their hair and wakes are held
in honor
of the deceased. Polygamy does exist, but the men rarely have more
than one woman in the same village. All wives are treated alike and
the man
rotates living with each one. After the birth of a child, men refrain
form working for two weeks, keeping a diet and not going to sea or
in the bush lest the child get sick and die. Men generally do all the
hunting
and fishing with a little help from the women in the latter. Agriculture
varies in that men in some tribes plant, but in others, it is believed
that women know how to do it better and are left alone to the work.
Their food consists mainly of fish, cassava, and coconuts. Bread is
also made
from cassava. As far as industry is concerned, the Carib rely on the
sale of items such as fowls, eggs, fruit, cassava bread, coconut oil,
and other products to their eastern Spanish-speaking neighbors. Much
of their work is done on a communal basis. They are experts in canoeing
and sailing as well. One of the favored occupations is smuggling. The
Catholic faith is the outwardly accepted religion, but the beliefs
and rituals of their forefathers are still practiced. They also have
a buye or
medicine man who performs shamanistic healing rituals for the sick and
possessed.
Conzemius has done an excellent job in his descriptive ethnography of
the Carib. Although the article does not have much theoretical depth,
it is informative and colorful. He paints a vivid picture of Carib life
and culture.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
FRITZ HANSELMANN Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley-Moore)
Conzemius, Eduard. Ethnological Notes on the Black Carib (Garif). American
Anthropologist April - June 1928 Vol.30(2):183-205
This article is concerned with the ethnohistory, language, subsistence
technology and rituals of a Caribbean people
today referred to as Garifuna. These subjects are discussed in
order and build up toward the author's implied hypothesis regarding a
somewhat sensationalized ritual event called the Dugu Festival (Baile
Mafya by the Ladinos and luban dogu by the Garifuna). Throughout
the article several ethnological hypotheses are offered or implied on
items ranging from language use, technology diffusion, Garifuna socio-political
position and the meanings behind specific rituals.
The account is based on the author's personal visit to Central
America during 1921-1922 and various early European histories
of the region which are clearly cited. Other persons are referred to
in the article without being cited. This is all blended together to
produce an account that is very informative, detailed and a pleasure
to read.
The first section of the article notes that Black Carib were originally
located on the island of St.Vincent in the Southeastern Caribbean but at that
time they were located on the Caribbean coast of Central America from
British Honduras (now Belize)
down to Honduras and
parts of Nicaragua.
Their total population was estimated to be around 23,500. In the next
two sections the author sketches
out the fascinating story of how Caribs (themselves a mixture of Carib
and Arawak Amerindians) came to intermix with Africans, how they were
forcibly relocated by the British government to the Bay Islands of
present-day Honduras and
some of their early political and economic history in their new home.
The next six sections are packed with detailed information about language,
physical appearance, customs, food technology and general livelihood.
The last two sections of the article are titled respectively "Religion,
Superstition, Sorcerers" and "Dugu Festival." In these the author
describes various Black Carib beliefs and practices. The article concludes
with a detailed description of a Dugu Festival which had by that time
come under some regulation by governmental authorities. Shockingly
the author implies that the death of a young boy after the ceremony
was caused
by forced and excessive alcohol consumption possibly as a replacement
for outright sacrifice.
Throughout the account the author provides extensive cross referencing
of Carib terms into Spanish, French and English. The wealth of linguistic
data also helps illustrate the attitudes of Central American Ladinos
and Europeans toward Caribs.
CLARITY: 5
PETER BREEDEN University of Southern Mississippi (Jeff Kaufmann)
Davidson, D.S. The Family Hunting Territory in Australia.
American Anthropologist 1928 Vol.30(1):614-631.
The author of this article used the Australian aborigines to prove that
historically, nomadic people have had individual property rights and
ownership. This is in stark contrast to what was previously believed;
L.H. Morgan in particular believed nomadic hunters, agriculturists
and pastoral peoples did not own property. Morgan’s theory was believed to
be true until first disproved by Stark in 1914. The author of the article
wrote to reaffirm Starks’ findings and provide a firm foundation for
the belief that nomadic people did indeed own land.
When this article was written, the Australians were believed to be the
most backward of the human race. For this reason, they provided an excellent
example of primitive nomadic people. Australians as a whole have a surprisingly
similar culture, in spite of the large size of their continent. The author
draws upon the research of several anthropologists who conducted research
in various parts of Australia.
The combined research of the anthropologists helps the author come to
the conclusion that historically, the Australians have had very specific
land ownership, and rules concerning trespassing, inheritance, and other
land issues.
In spite of the fact that the Australians were nomadic, their wanderings
were not random. The author reminds us that each was bound to custom
and tradition, including staying within his own land. The Australians
knew that individuals not only owned land, they owned the resources
on the land, including animals. Although they always shared excess
food, they knew that trespassing or taking advantage of another person’s
land was punishable, even by death. Landowners also had the right
to sell
their land. When a landowner died, his land was divided among his
sons. If he did not have sons, the land was divided among adjacent neighbors.
Not surprisingly, as Europeans began to invade Australia, land policies among
the natives began to change. As European conquests and diseases catastrophically
affected native population, the native people began to band together.
Thus, even by 1900, anthropologists were not finding individual land
ownership. The author had to rely on the research of earlier anthropologists
to verify his findings, citing anthropologists in the 1840s and 1850s.
From his findings, the author found enough evidence to disprove Morgan
and conclude that historically, nomadic hunters had a concept of real
property and a very structured system of property rights.
CLARITY: 4
CANDICE KULBETH Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley)
Davidson, D. S. The Family Hunting Territory in Australia. American Anthropologist June, 1928 Vol.30:614-631.
The point of this article is
to prove that the Australian people (who lived in the continent at
the time of the article’s publishing) are not unrestricted wanderers,
they are bound by customs and traditions which have the force of law. In the past, he says, many people have believed
that “primitive man” had no concept of land boundary or ownership. This has been disproved in recent years using
the Algonkian family hunting tribe system from North American: leaders
of this tribe have been able to indicate land ownership on a map. He then begins to discuss Australia. There is a dearth of literature on Australia,
he states, so he gives a brief description of the lifestyle there. He
first depicts the people who live in Australia as possessing a unified,
singular culture spanning the entire continent. He describes the Australian people as “the
primitive, if not the most backward, of all the world’s people” and proves
this point discussing the people’s crude tools, weapons, and their
nomadicism. Davidson then gives a brief summary of the
political organization of the people—they are divided into “tribes” which
occupy a definite territory. Every
tribe is divided into local groups which are comprised of paternally
related individuals and their wives and children. The
author then quotes the opinions of his contemporary anthropologists regarding
Australian family territoriality. Within each territory owned by each tribe,
individual families can also have their own land boundaries. Trespassing is forbidden, and these districts
are inherited from father to son. He
describes specific Australian tribes that his colleagues have studied
and the specifics of their tribal land distinctions. After this, he discusses the connection that
the Australians have with the land, where “the land belongs to humans, but also that the humans
likewise belong to the land.”
Near the end of the article he describes why this practice of family
hunting territory might have been overlooked. One
reason he offers is that because of the introduction of European diseases,
the custom might have been wiped out in recent years, and investigators
may not have scrutinized the populations enough to realize that territories
had existed previously. He also
attributes the disintegration to the influence of European culture. In conclusion, the author states that there
is ample evidence that the concept of property ownership did exist
amongst Australian natives and that Morgan’s theory that all primitive
nomadic hunters had no concept of property ownership is now almost,
if not entirely,
discredited.
This article is clear and concise. It
proves its points thoroughly, with believable proofs and applicable references
CLARITY: 5
ZOHAR SHAMASH Barnard College (Paige West)
Davidson, D.S. The Family Hunting Territory in Australia. American
Anthropologist January-March, 1928 Vol.30:614-631.
In his article, “The Family Hunting Territory in Australia,” Davidson
disputes the theory set forth by many previous anthropologists, most
prominently Morgan, that “primitive” man did not truly own property. Morgan referred to “primitive” people, or
Davidson’s “nomadic hunters” as “savages.” Morgan’s
basic proposition was that it is impossible for groups of people who
are constantly wandering in search of game to establish any sense of
property ownership. Davidson proposes,
and attempts to prove, that this was a misinterpretation on the part
of early anthropologists, and that increasing knowledge about nomadic
hunters stands in stark contradiction to the above perspective.
Davidson supports his claim that “primitive nomads” did own land with
extensive evidence regarding the practices of the Algonkian field of North America and the Australian aborigine. Davidson states that an Algonkian head of
a family knows so distinctly the lands to which his family is bound that
he could pinpoint them on a map. The
family is the immediate unit which owns land. In
stating his argument about the Australians, Davidson highlights the
idea that they are considered by some to be, “the most backward group of the
human race” (615). Davidson
states that the Australians are “nomadic hunters” characterized by “a series
of negative traits,” which include a lack of “pottery, agriculture, metallurgy,
clothing, permanent dwellings, and domesticated animals” (616).
While seen as generally nomadic, Davidson argues that the Australians
are limited in their movement by property ownership. Australian tribes are divided into local
groups which are composed of, “paternally related male individuals” and
their families who “occupy a geographical subdivision of the tribal territory
and possess exclusive rights to dwell within the limits of that territory” (618). Certain rules pertain to the land, such as
the fact that it is passed through male lineages and others must request
permission to cross the land. The
land is regarded as belonging to the whole family because all members
use its resources for sustenance. Thus,
the animals and other resources on the land belong to those who own it. Davidson emphasizes a deep respect for land
ownership among the Australians, which is epitomized by the complete
absence of war for the gain of land, and lack of Australian interest
to work on land other than their own.
In closing Davidson questions the lack of past anthropological knowledge
surrounding the property rights of the Australians. He proposes that the introduction of European
influence, in particular diseases, which greatly decreased the population
of many tribes, could have effected the distribution and ownership of
the land. Davidson suggests that
much of the research has been conducted in post-colonial times, during
which original systems have been altered. Ultimately,
Davidson closes his argument by stating the belief that enough support
lies in the argument of the Australians alone to disprove Morgan and
other early theorists who believed in the lack of land ownership among
nomadic people.
CLARITY: 4
ADRIENNE DAVIS Barnard College (Paige West)
Davidson, D.S. Notes on the Tete de Boule
Ethnology. American Anthropologist, January-March 1938 Vol. 30
: pg. 18-46.
The Tete de Boule Indians, or the Tcekamekiriniwak (whitefish people),
as they call themselves, are a unique group. They compromise about 160
miles of the western region of the Quebec province
and are bordered by the Trenche River on the east and the Megisken River on
the west. As an individual group, the Tete de Boule are no more important
than any other northern band, but their ethnological location makes them
significant in the eyes of anthropologists.
The Tete de Boule are bordered by four different groups of peoples:
the Montagnais, the Mistassini Naskapi, the Waswanipi Cree and the Algoquins.
In such a location, D.S. Davidson asserts, they are susceptible to influence
from all four groups. In his article, Davidson analyzes the developments
of the Tete de Boule and outlines their lifestyle, claiming they were
most heavily influenced by the Algonquin-Ojibwa group. He asserts that
they adopted their use of cradle-boards, square-headed snowshoes, and
bark wigwams from the Algonquins. They also construct their canoes using
the same method the Algonquins.
As Davidson notes, a typical family among the Tete de Boule will live
by itself for nearly 9 months of the year, during which time they experience
very little social contact. Under such circumstances, Davidson found
their advancements in adopting "principles of civilization" to
be impressive. Such advancements include canvas canoes, hand-powered
sewing machines, and manufactured clothing.
In the past, succession to the position of chieftain has been strictly
hereditary. Because the chief at the time of the article was not supported
well by the people, it was doubtful that he would gain sufficient support
to maintain his position. Davidson projected that the voice of the people
would be heard loudly and that the next election would be determined
entirely by election, opposed to the traditional practice of succession.
Davidson’s article provides a brief overview of the life of the Tete
de Boule. They are an interesting group, located in circumstances
that provide influence from other groups to affect their lifestyle.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
IAN DAVIS Brigham Young University.
(Julie Hartley).
Davidson, D. S. Notes On Tete De Boule Ethnology. American
Anthropologist January, 1928 Vol. 30(1): 18-46.
This article ethnographically locates the Tete de Boule, a Northeastern
North American Indian tribe, in relation to neighbouring tribes.
Davidson’s
primary interest is to decipher which culture group, the Montagnais-Naskapi
of the Labrador Peninsula, or the Algonquin-Ojibwa of the Great
Lakes, the Tete de Boule most resemble. The Tete de Boule
have cultural traits similar to each neighbouring culture group.
Davidson is interested in the Tete de Boule’s unique ethnographic
position. He nonetheless finds it very easy to arrive at the conclusion,
based
on
linguistic and material culture evidence, that they most resemble
the Algonquin-Ojibwa.
Davidson’s research question- who are the Tete de Boule most similar
to?- is answered by the third paragraph. The remainder the article is
a collection of, somewhat poorly organized, ethnographic data. Of interest
is his chart listing the cephalic index of male and female members of
the Tete do Boule band, as well as "half-breeds". The Tete
de Boule, as the name describes "are characterized by pronounced
brachycephaly," (p.21). He also describes, in detail the Tete
de Boule land tenure system, the practice of patrilocality, and the
patrilineal
inheritance of land. The conclusion of this article is a nine page
chart with the names of land-owning men, the family names of their
wives, the
total number of family member and some comments about hunting practices.
This chart is followed by a map, which attempts to plot these aforementioned
land holdings.
This ethnography is interesting because it contains a combination of
physical and cultural anthropological approaches. Davidson is influenced
by cultural diffusion theory, and references the idea that there are
areas of culture climax from which culture diffuses outward presumably
becoming more diffuse the further away the culture travels. However,
this article illustrates that diffusion theory, in and of itself, lacks
explanatory power. That diffsuion is a component of cultural genesis
and change can be assumed but, as Davidson exemplifies in this article,
the specifics of culture still need to be attended to. The attention
given to the details of Tete de Boule ethnography for the majority of
this article reveal that more is needed in understanding culture than
simply proving that diffusion has occurred.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
EMILY HERTZMAN: University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Delabarre, Edmund Burke. A Prehistoric Skeleton
From Grassy Island. American Anthropologist
June-September, 1928 Vol. 30 (3): 476-480.
On May 21, 1927, the author, Edmund Burke Delabarre, located bone fragments
underneath four feet of peat at Grassy Island in Massachusetts. After
some inspection he realized that they were human bones dating from nearly
one thousand to fifteen hundred years ago. The disk-shaped bones were
scattered around in a small pile, ranging in size from small specks to
pieces two inches long. He concluded that there were fragments from an
arm, leg, and a foot and that most definitely there were portions of
a human skull.
A colleague, Professor H. H. Wilder, concluded that the bones came from
an adult. Wilder also noticed that animal remains were among the fragments
discovered. An opposing view came from Barnum Brown. He concluded that
the remains belonged to a much younger person than Wilder had supposed
and disagreed that animal bones were present.
Delabarre concluded that the remains could not have come from the result
of a burial. Many began to wonder how the remains got there in the condition
they were in. Brown believed that the appearance of the bones was a result
of long weathering. Willoughby thought
that they were the remains of a cremated body. Still Delabarre wondered
why there were only small parts of a human skeleton, mixed with bones
of an animal in such a small space.
After consulting with others, several individuals announced their ideas
as to how this occurred. The first conclusion was that it was a portion
of a human settlement. This was quickly denounced because of the lack
of additional artifacts, such as pottery. The second conclusion was that
it was the remains of a prisoner burnt at the stake and that the animal
remains must have come from animals that were burnt along with the human.
The third conclusion was that it was the burial of a cremated body in
some perishable container. The animal pieces could have been included
to serve as food for the departed spirit. The fourth conclusion was that
it was the stomach-contents of a carnivore, such as a wolf, that had
partaken of a human body, died, and then been disemboweled. The final
conclusion was that it was contents of a medicine bag because all sorts
of unusual things went into such bags. This final conclusion was the
one that they considered most likely happened. Although none of these
conclusions were precise, the surest conclusion was that the remains
belonged to an Indian who lived in Massachusetts about ten to fifteen hundred
years ago.
CLARITY RANKING: 5
ADRIENNE WOOLLEY Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley)
Delabarre, Edmund Burke. A
Prehistoric Skeleton From Grassy Island. American Anthropologist June-September,
1928 Vol.30(3):476-480.
In 1925, Delabarre printed in American Anthropologist information
about a buried Native-American encampment site discovered at Grassy Island submerged
in the Taunton River in Massachusetts. In 1927, at the same site Delabarre uncovered
fragmentary remains of a Native-American who must have inhabited the
land at least a thousand years before, when the site was located above
sea level. Originally Delabarre
did not believe the fragments to be of human origin and thus he did not
preserve all of the pieces. He
later returned to collect more fragments and, though it is possible that
Delabarre may have mistakenly collected foreign fragments or may have
lost some fragments from the deposit, in this article Delabarre states
he feels confident that his collection is mostly pure and complete.
According to Delabarre, the fragments appeared to be unaltered other
than “checking,” which was most likely caused by weathering or fire. Other strange characteristics of the deposit
include its small size (it was not large enough to include an entire
skeleton) and the absence of teeth. Most
confusing is the presence of nonhuman remains in the deposit.
Delabarre cites others’ professional opinions of the deposit in this
article. Professor H.H. Wilder
claimed to have discovered in the deposit many fragments from animals
along with the remains of what he believed to be an adult human. On the other hand, Barnum Brown found only
one nonhuman piece (a vertebra) with the human remains, which he believed
came from a young person. Brown
also felt the checked appearance of the bones came from weathering while
C.C. Willoughby believed their appearance resulted from cremation.
Delabarre lists five possible explanations for the deposit that each
take into account the remains’ unusual characteristics. According to Delabarre, the fragments may
have been a portion of a kitchen midden, the remains of a prisoner burnt
at the stake, the remains of a body cremated in some perishable container,
the stomach contents of a carnivore, or the contents of a medicine bag. Though Delabarre seems to lean toward last
two options, he makes no conclusions other than that the remains are
those of a Native-American who live in Massachusetts at
least ten to fifteen thousand years ago.
CLARITY: 5
NICO D’AUTERIVE Columbia College (Paige West)
Delabarre, Edmund Burke. A Prehistoric Skeleton From Grassy Land. American
Anthropologist, 1928. Vol. 30
: 476-480.
The author of this article wrote previously about Indian relics discovered
on an ancient site. In this article,
Delabarre adds extensively, describing a prehistoric skeleton found on
the same site, proving the existence of Indian inhabitants near the Taunton River in Massachusetts about
fifteen hundred years ago. Throughout
the article there is great speculation as to how the skeletal remains
arrived at their present location, but no clear and definite answer to
the question of where they came from.
Delabarre’s larger intellectual concern is addressed in both the beginning
and end of the article. Regardless
of the way the remains came to be, it is correct to assume that the remains
are of Indian origin and prove the area was inhabited by Indians about
fifteen hundred years ago. The
remaining body of the article poses various theories as to how the skeleton
arrived there. In this area of
the article however, Delabarre gives the opinions of those who have better
knowledge on the subject, such as Professor H. H. Wilder, Barnum Brown,
and Mr. Willoughby. These experts
give an array of possibilities as to how and why the skeleton appears
where it does and its current physical conditions.
Delabarre presents his evidence and the theories of the given experts
in list form. Due to the large
range scenarios, categorizing such evidence in any other way would be
not as effective. Delabarre presents
the range in possibility by naming each expert and then describing their
theory along with the historical evidence that has led them to this theory. The list contains five major possibilities,
in sequence, ranging from the most probable to the farthest possible. The most likely scenario consists of the
remains of a prisoner or the portion of a kitchen midden. The last theory is the stomach of a carnivore
killed after it gnawed potions of a human, all but the stomach being
disposed of.
Delabarre ends the article by restating his main concern, the affirmation
that the remains prove that Indians inhabited this specific Grassy Land about
an estimated fifteen hundred years ago. After
giving a wide selection of theories to choose from as to how the remains
came to be at their present location, Delabarre ends the article with
both the affirmation of Indian existence in this region at that time,
and the difficulty of pin-pointing the exact means as to which the mysterious
skeleton arrived where it was discovered.
CLARITY: 4
KIMBERLY WEST Barnard College (Paige West)
Delabarre, Edmund Burke. A
Prehistoric Skeleton From Grassy Island. American Anthropologist, June-September
1928. Vol. 30 (3): 476-480.
On May 21, 1927, the author unearthed bone fragments at Grassy Island,
which lies under several feet of peat in the Taunton River in Massachusetts. Today the island is also covered by high
tides; the remains must date back to about fifteen-hundred years ago,
when the land was still above-water and habitable. Upon
realizing that the bones were human, Delabarre determined them to be
the fragmentary remains of a native who once inhabited the site.
Delabarre emphasizes that the deposit was sharply defined, with a clear
distinction between the overlying peat and the ancient surface. Found ten feet beneath this surface, the
bones were broken into tiny fragments and compacted into a small, disk-shaped
mass. Other than a checking perhaps
due to weathering, the bones appeared unaltered. Little was found nearby to help determine
the identity of the deposit.
There were several enigmas about the remains. For one, there seemed to be many portions
absent from the skeleton, despite the clear-cut compactness of the deposit. Moreover,
animal bones were intermixed with the human bones. Given
these oddities, Delabarre and his consultants arrived at five hypotheses
that might explain the situation. Their
first hypothesis, that the remains were part of an ancient refuse-heap,
was essentially discounted because of the many characteristic features
that were lacking. Second, they
reasoned that the remains might be those of a prisoner burnt at the stake. However, Delabarre states that this supposition
conflicts with the incompleteness of the skeleton. The incomplete skeleton also undermines the
third explanation—that the remains might represent a cremated body
buried in a perishable container. Fourth,
Delabarre postulates that the deposit might have been the stomach-contents
of a carnivore. However, this
conclusion rests upon a series of possible but highly improbable assumptions. The final suggestion, which merits some consideration,
is that the deposit had been the contents of a medicine bag.
Ultimately, none of these hypothesis are fully convincing. The only certainty Delabarre provides about
the remains is that they were the bones of an Indian living in Massachusetts somewhere
between ten- and fifteen-hundred years ago.
CLARITY RANKING: 5
NATALIE SEARS Barnard College (Paige West).
Densmore, Frances. The
True Story of a Little Stone Image. American Anthropologist April-June,
1928. Vol. 30(2): 311-313.
Densmore was shown a small stone figure in a museum, which had been
collected from the Makah on Cape Flattery of the Olympic Peninsula on
the Northwest coast. She was asked if she had seen carvings like it and
was given a photograph of the figurine in order to determine its use
if she returned to the Makah tribe in the future
The figurine is about 11 inches tall and looks like a person looking
up and holding something in its arms. The figure looks sad and has a
broken place on the top of its head. The figure appears to be sexless
and is kneeling. The object it is holding looks like a small animal.
When Densmore returned to the Makah tribe in the summer of 1926, she
asked around about the figurine. An old man, named Young Doctor, identified
the figurine as a fishing sinker carved by a man named Santiano. The
broken part on the top of the head was where a nail had come off that
was put there to hold the fish line.
Young Doctor thought the object that the figurine was holding looked
like a baby sea lion. Densmore interviewed another person who said Santiano
carved many things and had the help of a tumanos (something that comes,
according to Indian legend, when a man is very depressed). Young Doctor
though that this sinker represented a creature like a mermaid, possibly
the tumanos. Although Densmore interviewed people to determine what the
sinker represented, no one knew. Only Santiano, the man who made it,
could tell what it stood for and he was dead. So, the little stone image
will sit in a museum without anyone knowing what it represented.
CLARITY RANKING: 5
JENNIFER MEILSTRUP Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley).
Densmore, F. The True Story of a Little Stone
Image. 1928. American Anthropologist. Vol 30:311-313.
This article describes a carved, slate figure collected from the Makah
peoples at Cape Flattery. Described
initially as a "fancy sinker", the author’s Makah informants
reveal mysterious pieces of information in order to give deeper insight
into the significance of this figure. The original carver- a medicine
man named Santiano- is no longer alive, so no one will ever truly know
what the figure represents. Nevertheless, Densmore recounts two conversations
she had with knowledgeable Makah men in order to give the figure some
context.
The first man Densmore speaks with is "Young Doctor": he speculates
that the figure is a fancy sinker and depicts a person holding a baby
sea lion in its arms. He further questions whether or not it represents
a sea-dwelling creature, like a "mermaid". Although Young Doctor
has never seen one, he relates a story from his own childhood when long
hairs became entangled on his fishing line: shortly thereafter he experienced
many bites and success with fish. He believes the hairs came from such
a creature and caused his good luck. The second Makah man Densmore questions,
is an old whaler named Mr. Irving: he believes the carver (Santiano)
had a "tumanos" to help him with carving (we can infer this
to be some sort of spirit helper). The "tumanos" would only
come to a man who feels "so small that he does not care whether
he lives or dies" (p.312), but just what caused Santiano to need
this assistance we do not know. Similarly we will never know why the
expression on the face of the figure is so sad and tragic.
Although this article is inconclusive, it is not due to a lack of effort
on the part of the author. Densmore provides us with some interesting
stories from the Makah people that help give some explanation for the
mysterious stone figure: but they are far from being the "true story".
What she concludes, is that the little figure "will take its place
in the collections of the museum" (p.313), where a label can describe
the origin, but not its significance: this, she feels, is the real
truth of the figure.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
CHRISTINA ZAENKER University of British
Columbia
Estabrooks, G.H. That Question of Racial
Inferiority. American Anthropologist 1928 Vol. 30: 470-475.
In the early twentieth century many anthropologists were beginning to
doubt some of the claims made in the nineteenth century that less developed
cultures were some how biologically and socially inferior to northern
Europeans. G. H. Estabrooks’s article "That Question of Racial
Inferiority" analyzes
the opinions of various anthropologists in America and England as to their opinion regarding
what if any differences in intelligence are determined by race. Estabrook’s
investigation revealed much ambiguity regarding the issue. Most were
quick to point out that no noted differences had yet been proven.
Estabrooks shows how the historical record reveals many early technological
advances had no European influence; he uses the civilizations of Egypt and
the Euphrates as examples. He also notes the innovations
in astronomy and masonry of the Mayan and Incan civilizations of Central
and South America. Estabrooks refutes any claims that Roman,
Carthaginian or Babylonian cultures came from Nordic (Northern European)
sources. These theories were apparently being made at the time by ethnocentric
(racist) northern Europeans.
One of the main flaws in determining racial factors is identifying what
exactly makes up a specific race. Many people at this time were making
assumptions that Italians represent an ethnic group where in actuality
they are of a very mixed heritage. The same goes for blacks in North
America whose bloodlines were influenced heavily by whites.
Thus, finding a true definition of race is essential in any effort to
test intelligence based on that premise. Also vital is finding a valid
way to measure intelligence in an unbiased manner. Tests that contain
verbal questions favor different ethnic groups. Estabrooks cites examples
of Philippine children who did poorly on the verbal sections of the exams
(English was for them a second language) but actually scored higher on
the math section than their North American counterparts. Estabrooks also
addresses the issue of the quality of the education received. Black children
in the Jim Crow South were at an obvious disadvantage to white children.
This article does a good job of recognizing the complexity of the issue
of race and intelligence. Estabrooks distinguishes the errors existing
in many arguments of the so-called success of the American colonization
as being based on racial superiority. He gives Cortez as an example who
defeated the Aztecs with smallpox as much as with steal. This assertion
was very controversial for 1928, when many still likely believed that
the conquest of Native Americans was due to the superior European intellect
and culture founded in Europe.
The article ends with Estabrooks stating the need for anthropological
and biological authorities to evaluate any tests measuring intelligence
along racial lines. These disciplines are just as essential as psychology
in determining a fair testing method. Even then Estabrooks doubts that
a test designed by Americans would be fair. Racial biases are difficult
to eliminate. According to Estabrooks the question of racial superiority
remains in doubt. This is as true today as it was in 1928.
CLARITY RANKING: 5
JOHN EDVALSON Brigham Young University (Julie
R. Hartley)
Estabrooks,G.H. That Question of Racial Inferiority. American
Anthropologist, 1928 Vol.30; 470-475.
In this article, the author questions about inferiority or superiority
between races. He blames that many of anthropologists in England have moderate opinion about
racial inferiority or even their attitudes are very ethnocentric. He
claims that as long as there is no satisfying proof, racial inferiority
should not be determined.
From historical point of view, he claims that the people who developed
great civilizations like Egyptian or the Maya were not the Nordic origin.
Therefore, he denies historical proof of racial inferiority. Moreover,
the author strongly points out the falseness of intelligence tests.
The author argues that even though intelligence tests should be determine
the intelligence of "races," since some groups of people such
as the Italian, the Jew and African Americans are not categorized as
one pure race, the tests tend to test the intelligence of "nationalities" rather
than "races." He also discusses unfairness of language handicaps
in the tests. Because the intelligence tests are taken in English,
he declares that it is obvious that children whose first language is
not
English get lower score that the children who speak English as mother
tongue in verbal tests. In addition, he points out that children who
have intelligence tests should have same standard of school experience
for the reason that I.Q. is basically a function of school experience.
Finally the author claims that this issue should not be studied only
by psychologists but also this issue lies on anthropologists as well
as biologists.
The assessments of this article are very organized and clear. Also,
his denial of racial inferiority and his encouragement toward more
anthropologists’ involvement
on this issue are clearly and effectively stated.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
YUKIKO KASAHARA University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Faye, Paul Louis. Christmas Fiestas of the
CupeZo. American Anthropologist October-December, 1928. Vol. 30
(4):651-658.
Paul Louis Faye's article examines the Christmas fiestas among the Cupeno,
a small branch of the Shoshonean-speaking peoples of southern California. The object
of Faye’s trip to the Cupeno was to secure linguistic data. However,
every time he was out on the grounds he found it difficult to not make
note of the fiestas he witnessed. The village fiesta was fast superseding
the old type of festivity based on the exchange of courtesies between
clans. Spanish and Catholic factors were at work to break up the old
spirit party of the clans. Faye explains that reconstructions of the
past are indispensable, but only as a background for the study of culture
in its incessant, ever existing demonstrations. As native traits in
the culture of the Cupeno were disappearing fast, Faye found it necessary
to publish these notes, adding that the fiestas might never take place
again. Among the Cupeno we have an unusual case of social transformations.
The Cupeno were wrenched from their former habitat and given a new
way
of life. At the time of Faye's research among the Cupeno, 1919, the
tribe was still hanging on by a thread to their old ways of life. The
Cupeno's
former habitat was in the foothills below the San Jacinto range, at Kupa. In 1903 they were moved to
Pala, their location at the time of Faye's visit. Their population
in 1919 was 200. Faye attended several fiestas, which mainly consisted
of
dances, feasting, smoking, and fires. The first two fiestas were very
similar. The fiestas were officiated by a man who was "the one who
is over the fire," or the fire tender. The chief did not officiate
in any capacity. The fiestas were held at one of the homes of the clan
chief. In the yard, an empty space had been converted into a wamkic,
or an area enclosed by canvas walls. Inside the wamkic, benches and
a few chairs were provided. Many dances occurred in the wamkic. There
were
dances performed by just men, just women, and both. The dances were
accompanied by drums, grunts, and singing. After the dances, the singing
began. Faye
notes that one of the chiefs would begin a song, and the others would
follow. A good many people remember the songs, but they do not know
how to start them. Not the words, but the music fails them.
The fiestas were followed by the 'putting out the fire' ceremony. At
the ceremony, a native Reservation police officer, made a speech about
how the old ways were good for the old people, but the younger people
had better think about something else. The gesture was intended to be
impressive, as the clan chiefs stood behind the speaker.
This article will interest individuals who are interested in fiestas
and dances among Native American tribes. The article also reaches out
to a wider audience among the social sciences with regard to history.
Faye's article convincingly illustrates and expresses how important the
fiestas used to be for the Cupeno.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
LAURA POULSEN Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley)
Faye, Paul Louis. Christmas Fiestas of the Cupeno. American Anthropologist, 1928 Vol.30: 651-658.
While the author’s purpose of his trip in 1919 was to secure linguistic
data, he stumbled across a unique ethnological moment. The Cupeno had been moved (1903) from their
former home in the foothills below the San Jacinto range to Pala in Southern California. The
author finds this culture on the edge of extinction due to various factors
including their translocation. This
cultural shift is unique and manifested in their Christmas Fiestas. Faye
vividly describes the set-up of tents and seats of the first night of
the Fiestas. Only men sat on the benches, while women sat on low stools
and boxes. The active officer
of the ceremony was the fire-tender whose main purpose was to keep the
fire blazing. The fire-tender
fulfills many important roles in the community such as: holding prayers
in the Priest’s absence, baptisms, and burials. The author notes that
the newer generation does not respect his role as much as the older one,
and notes that he was among the last. Then the dancing and singing of
the men began for thirteen rounds. Their formations and sounds are described
in great detail. When all is finished, the women and most of the men
leave. The women leave food in buckets for the men to cook for the next
day. Then, the next day the “boys” [author’s parentheses] of the town
raised money and held a fiesta where there were many similar dances.
They sang many songs led by a very old man. The author analyzes the
relationship between the words and the music. Now the women dance thirteen
rounds.
Their dance and song are described as a rather spiritless performance. After
that, Faye describes the dance before the fire which involves both
men and women. There is some debate whether the dance performed by
the women
here are girls, unmarried women, or all women; the author remembers
only unmarried women participating in the daring dance. On this night
three
women singers are the ones keeping the fire going. The men’s singing
lasts until dawn when the old women leave. Finally the fiestas are
over after the men and women dance in a circle around the fire and
the men
put out the fire.
Faye believes these rituals represent the gradual change of this Indian
community to a more European-like community. He recognizes the Catholic
Church and Spanish influences as major factors to the social transformations
which are accelerated by their recent translocation.
CLARITY: 4
MARIANNA DOUGHERTY Barnard College (Paige West)
Gifford, E.W. Notes on Central Pomo and Northern Yana Society. American Anthropologist April-June,
1928 Vol. 30 (2): 675-684.
Gifford uses the Californian Indian tribes of the Central Pomo and Northern Yana as the backdrop for his discussion of certain
characteristics common to tribal societies. Although several different
aspects are discussed, the focus is on political and kinship systems.
According to the author, an actual connection exists between chieftainship
and lineage (genealogy) among the Pomo and Yana.
He states that different bloodlines exist in villages and that the unification
of these lineages is a significant achievement because the result of
the uniting of families is the beginning of village life. This unification
is evidenced in the Central Pomo and Northern Yana.
The political system of the Pomo is the first upon which the author
expounds. Chiefs inherit their office through either the mother or father.
Sisters and daughters of chiefs are called cheftainess, or queen. For
the most part the transmission of office occurs from father to son. The
chief passes down his position to his son. Transmission of office only
occurs through blood and not marriage. If the chief has no son, he passes
his duties on to a brother or the son of a brother or sister. There can
be from three to four chiefs in one village alone, each chief at the
head of a different section of the village, each answering to one superior
chief. The main chief, to whom all answer, inherited his position due
to the fact that his ancestors were the first to occupy the tribal land,
giving their future kinsmen precedence over any others who dwell there.
This inheritance of chieftainship through genealogy demonstrates the
link between lineage and politics among the Pomo.
As supporting evidence, Gifford also details the political structure
of the Northern Yana, which is very
similar in nature to that of the Central Pomo. The chiefs of the Northern
Yana also achieved their status through heredity, suggesting
that their political system is also organized on a basis of lineage,
supporting Gifford’s theory of the connection. Many similarities abound
in the political structure. There are plural chiefs within the village;
the main chief heads the original family and the inferior chiefs represent
families that arrived later at the area. The people only obey the principal
chief, viewing the others as "lieutenants." In the Northern
Yana, the chieftainship is passed down from father to eldest
son, holding true to the idea that lineage is connected to leadership.
Gifford uses his notes on these two tribes to show how the unification
of various lineages has occurred. The article is very clearly written
and understandable, but seems random in scope, lacking cohesiveness between
institutional characteristics-such as land ownership, marriage, death,
names, and the calendar-and unification. The main idea gets lost in the
actual ethnography. The unification clearly exists, but how was it achieved?
Gifford shows that the various lineages within the two tribes have unified,
but fails to explain any type of processual action that might have taken
place to cause the unification.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
FRITZ HANSELMANN Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley-Moore)
Gifford, E.W. Notes on Central
Pomo and Northern Yana Society. American Anthropologist April-June,
1928 Vol. 30 (2):675-684.E.
W.
Gifford provides a descriptive account of the political and genealogical
linkages in several Central Pomo and Northern Yana villages. While
the linkages are made clear in this work, it is not clear as to whether
Gifford actually intended to do this. One
must remember that this work was being done at a time when anthropologists
were attempting to “salvage” the disappearing cultures of various Native
American groups. During this era of “salvage anthropology,” it
was typical for works of this nature to be more descriptive than analytical. The
data he presents is based on fieldwork done in the Native American California
groups in 1917 for the University of California. The data was primarily derived from informants
in the villages. He discusses
the institution of chief and how this title is transmitted. Other aspects of these societies, including
land ownership, marriage practices and housing are also touched upon. Gifford
finds that, while considerable variety existed in land ownership practices,
a core uniformity existed in chieftainship and societal organization.
Chiefs (djayadul) of villages of the Central Pomo acquired office
primarily by inheritance through the mother or the father. While female chiefs, or chieftainesses (matakaletc),
were not unheard of, this only occurred through inheritance, not through
marriage. The transmission of
this title primarily occurred from father to the eldest son.
Gifford further discusses land ownership patterns among the Central
Pomo. In the Hopland area village
there was little or no land ownership. All
hunting, fishing and gathering lands were communal. Some Yokaia village lands were considered
to be family owned and included some fishing and acorn gathering sites. There were, however, no family-owned hunting
grounds.
With regard to marriage and post-marital housing there was no fixed
pattern. Recently married couples
spent some time living with the wife’s family and then some time spent
living with the husband’s family before permanently settling. In this discussion Gifford provides cursory
description of burial practices and the Pomo calendar, though how these
things factor into the whole discussion is not made clear.
For the Northern Yana group in the
Istalomato village there was a superior chief (mudjaupa) and lesser
chiefs. The author supposes the
superior chief was the head of the lineage that originally held the chiefdom
while the lesser chiefs headed lineages that moved into the area later. In this village the sons of the chief bore
his name or title, and wives and daughters were called chiefesses (mudjaupana). Here Gifford points out that, where the Central
Pomo employed separate stems for the terms chief and chiefess, the Northern
Yana employed the same stem.
While Gifford provides insightful descriptions of the Central Pomo and
Northern Yana institutions of chieftainship and marriage, as well as
cursory descriptions of land ownership and burial practices, his overall
argument in not clear. His descriptions
illustrate an underlying link between genealogy and chiefdom, but whether
this was Gifford’s intention is not clear. His
study also shows that, while this link between genealogy and chieftainship
may have existed in both cultures, substantial variability within and
among these two societies also existed.
This study, published in 1928, illustrates some of the work being done
in anthropology as it was emerging as a discipline. These earlier works show the reader the foundations
on which anthropology was built and illustrate how far this discipline
has come in the last seventy years.
CLARITY: 3
JEANNE THOMAS University of Southern Mississippi (Jeff Kaufmann)
Gifford, Edward Winslow. The Cultural
Position of the Coast Yuki. American Anthropologist January, 1928
Vol. 30(1): 112-115.
This article defines the cultural position of the Coast Yuki peoples
of California by comparing
them with their neighbours living to the North, South and East. Edward
Winslow Gifford uses this four page article as an arena to show that
the coast Yuki are variously and interchangeably, primitive, underdeveloped,
and inferior as compared with their relatively sophisticated neighbours,
the Northern Pomo, the Yukian Huchnom, the Athabascan Kato, and the
Athabascan Sinkyone. Gifford begins his essay with a description of
the living Coast
Yuki elder’s who he employed as informants for his research. Then he
proceeds to highlight the positive cultural traits present among the
Coast Yuki’s neighbouring cultures, but absence in Coast Yuki culture
proper. These absences, according to Gifford, constitute quantifiable
data proving that the Coast Yuki are at a lower stage of human development.
In addition to summarizing the coast Yuki’s deficiencies, as Gifford
sees them, he also lists a number of their own, unique, negative cultural
traits. For example, "[s]tone-boiling, cooking in ashes, and in
or over coals were the only method," (pg.113) of cooking used by
the Coast Yuki, which Gifford believes is indicative of their "backward
position" (pg.113). Although unarticulated in this article, Gifford’s
argument is premised upon a number of theoretical assumptions. First,
Gifford views human cultures as though they are arranged into a continuum
ranging from simple to complex, where simple is inferior and pre-historic,
while complex is progressive and contemporary. Second, Gifford employs
a model of cultural diffusion that locates the origin of cultural practices
in specific centers. It is from these cultural centers that traits diffuse
outwards, becoming increasing diluted the further they move from the
area of origin and concentration. "The sparseness of the northwestern
traits . . . suggests that their diffusion has been recent and superficial," (pg.
115). This article is interesting not only for its analysis of the Coast
Yuki’s cultural position, but also because it is written in the idiom
of the 1920’s when relevant debates and theories in Anthropology focussed
on evolutionism and diffusionism.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
EMILY HERTZMAN: University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Gifford, Edward Wilson. Position
of the Coast Yuki. American Anthropologist April-June, 1928 Vol.
30 (2): 112-115
When considering the Coast Yuki, Gifford found that they were quite
primitive compared to their other central California neighbors. With scarce information considering the tribe,
which consisted mostly of a few vague pages published by A.L. Kroeber,
Gifford decided that he would personally solve this puzzle.
The purpose of this paper is “to show why the Coast Yuki are adjudged
primitive in relation to central California, and how that primitiveness
has been overlaid by certain northwestern California traits.” Gifford
argues that the reason for the primitive nature is due to remote geological
location, which has isolated the Yuki, except for the recent adoption
of northwestern California traits due
to intermarriage with the Sinkyone.
Gifford first describes the remote location of the Coast Yuki, giving
images of a mountain ridge of two thousand feet and a border made of
a number of creeks. He then goes
on to give the general state of the Coast Yuki, saying that they lack
religious, social, and material refinements that are found in other central California groups.
Gifford then goes on to describe some of the northwestern California traits which the Coast Yuki possess, including
a harpoon used for hunting (which is only obtained directly from northern California). He goes on to claim that these northwestern
traits are specialties of the culture, while many of the central traits
are either nonexistent or of a very primitive nature.
In the end, Gifford admits that there must be some other restraining
influence that has prevented absorption of more modern traits that other
central Californians obtain.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
Sarah Broadbent: Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley)
Green, Laura S. and Beckwith, Martha Warren. Hawaiian
Household Customs. American Anthropologist January, 1928
Vol. 30(1): 1-17.
This article provides a description of a number of cultural practices
of traditional Hawaiians arranged into the following general headings: the
house, eating customs, fishing customs, planting
customs, travelling, and the weather. This article
has no introduction, no thesis, and no conclusion. Instead the authors
enter directly into ethnographic descriptions of Hawaiian household customs.
Descriptive and explanatory, this article presents data objectively,
but makes no analysis beyond stating the emic rationalizations for cultural
practices.
The first two subsections, the house and eating customs present
the data in an organized manner and provide limited, yet adequate descriptions.
The organization and thoroughness of the following three subsections
deteriorates considerably. The result is that the article reads more
like a list than ethnography. For example in the section about travelling
the authors unite in one long paragraph "[c]ertain signs concerned
with the making of a journey" (pg. 11). These "signs" include
what is means to see a hat, to have a hat fall off ones head, to see
a person with their thumb between their index and their middle finger,
or to met a blind man, a lame man, or a bow-legged man and other seemingly
random notes about Hawaiian beliefs. The tendencies to list rather
then elaborate the cultural phenomena, although stylistically wanting,
and
analytically barren, nonetheless allows for many subjects and examples
to be included in a short number of pages.
When accounting for a given cultural custom the authors provide one
connection linking the custom with another feature of Hawaiian culture.
For example, in the section about fishing they claim that "[t]he
presence of a shark is indicated by an unusual warmth in the sea as sharks
are believed to be closely related to the volcano goddess" (pg.
8). The reader knows that volcanoes are hot and therefore can make
the connection between a volcano and hot water. However the authors
do not
explain who the volcano goddess is, or explain the associative relationship
between sharks and this deity. This article references many cultural
practices and beliefs and would be useful for those seeking early records
of a particular practice, or for those who want to survey many aspects
of Hawaiian culture before reading more detailed, analytic and interpretive
literature.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
EMILY HERTZMAN: University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Hall, Ivan C. "A Parmaco-Bacteriologic
study of two Malayan Blow-Gun Poisoned Darts." American Anthropologist
March, 1928 Vol 30 (1): p 47-59.
In this study, Ivan C. Hall examines the poison on two Malayan blowgun
darts. His primary interest is to discover if there are any bacteria
in the poison that produce a dangerous amount of toxin. He also performs
some tests to study the toxicity of the poison and its chemical composition.
Malayan darts often contain a poison the natives call ipoh. This term is a general word for poison
and does not reflect any specific composition. Often ipoh is formed from the toxic sap of the
Upas tree. However, Hall does not know how the ipoh on these darts was formed. He did not
acquire the darts himself, and by the time he examined them they were
at least seventeen years old.
Hall first studied the toxicity of the poison. He removed a sample from
the darts, dissolved it in water, injected measured doses of it into
guinea pigs, and timed how long it took for them to die. By this he was
able to measure the toxicity of the poison. He discovered that the poison
on the shorter dart was more toxic than the poison on the longer dart.
His findings indicated that the poison was less toxic than the poison
on other darts examined by other researchers, but because his darts were
so old, the poison may have lost some of its effect.
Hall then did a chemical examination of the poison, but because of the
small amount of material left on the darts, he was unable to discover
any interesting properties.
Next Hall performed a bacteriological study. He put several samples
of the poison into different cultures, allowed them to grow, and injected
them into pigs. However, none of the pigs died or lost weight, but several
of them produced small sores that soon healed. He examined the bacteria
that caused these sores, but was unable to identify their species. He
gives an extensive list of their physical properties.
Hall concludes that unlike the arrows of Bushmen, the Malayan darts
do not contain any serious "pathogenic" or disease-causing
bacteria.
Clarity ranking: 4
CLAY LARSON Brigham Young University (Dr.
J.R. Hartley)
Hall, Ivan C. A Pharmaco-Bacterialogic Study
of Two Malayan Blow-Gun Poisoned Darts. American Anthropologist
January, 1928 Vol. 30(1): 47-59.
This article meticulously documents the laboratory study of the poison
residue extracted from the tips of two Malayan blow-gun darts, dating
back to the late 19th century. This study conducted by Dr.
Ivan C. Hall, professor of Bacteriology and Public Health at the University
of Colorado Medical School (at the time he wrote this article) contributes,
to this volume of American Anthropologist, a unique, and relatively non-anthropological
perspective. The research is scientific, based on quantitative, observable
data, and the article is organized like a lab report, containing numerous
chemical names, formulas and technical language. Hall is interested in
determining whether the blow-darts contain, in addition to poison, infection
diseases, suggesting the presence of bacteria. After a brief description
of the poison used on the darts, a poison called locally (on the Malayan Peninsula and in Borneo) Ipoh, a derivative of the sap from
the Upas tree, the author describes his methods for the bacteriological
analysis.
This article contains interesting methodological descriptions including
a detailed description of the live animal testing conducted on guinea
pigs. "Another guinea-pig of the same size was inoculated subcutaneously
with 2 c.c . . . [i]mmediately after the autopsy showed the heart in
diastole but on irritation with the scalpel it slowly contracted,"(pg.53).
Hall carefully completes several tests of the resin, transforming it
from crystallized form to dissolved form in order to determine its
chemical composition, and even though he detects some bacteria living
on the poison,
none of the bacteria present are pathogenic bacteria, although
some of the guinea pigs developed legions in the areas where they were
subcutaneously exposed to the hay bacilli detected. Dr. Ivan
C. Hall’s research is synergistic of the two large and distinct, yet
related camps of science and social science. The strength of this article
is
the emphasis on the details of laboratory procedures and analysis.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
EMILY HERTZMAN: University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Hough, Walter. The Lead
Glaze Decorated Pottery of the Pueblo Region. American
Anthropologist 1928 Vol. 30:243-249.
Certain Pueblo pottery
styles are identified by an occurrence of green lead glaze. In 1928,
there was a question whether it was introduced by the Spanish or developed
by Pueblo potters.
A new school of thought at the time was trying to use stratigraphy as
a methodology to determine cultural sequences based on ceramics. An archaeologist
named Hodge found, on the basis of stratification, that the green glaze
pottery was present in a prehistoric layer at the Hawaikuh site in New
Mexico. In his article, Walter Hough challenged
the plausibility of pre-Spanish lead glazing by Pueblo potters
and the validity of Hodge’s findings.
First, Hough tried determining the origin of the glazed pottery. This
was difficult in that the boundaries determined for the glazed pottery
had been established over a 20,000 square mile area in New Mexico, and the instances were extremely
sporadic. The first mention of the glaze pottery in literature was in
1892 by Bandelier (247).
Hough then delivered a series of arguments against the likelihood of
pre-Spanish lead glaze pottery in New
Mexico. These included the fact that it would
have been independent of any other lead glaze pottery in North
America. Also the lead was not readily available to the Pueblo potters. The techniques that would have been used
to both obtain the lead and create the glaze were already known in Europe. He points out that sherds with the glaze were
found near Spanish buildings, but were not used in building the walls,
indicating that they were not there before the walls were built. And
finally, lead glazing did not survive to the present, which Hough felt
signified that it was not an indigenous art.
Hough concluded that a pre-Spanish glaze was not probable. Since Hodge
determined that the stratigraphy at the Hawaikuh site indicated prehistoric
status for ceramics with the green glaze, Hough felt that it was the
methodology of the Pueblo stratigraphy
that must be brought into question.
What makes this 1928 article interesting is the way he challenges the
findings of someone else’s research. At a time when the focus of anthropology
was a concerted rush to collect information on disappearing cultures,
Hough used several well thought out arguments to pull in the reins on
suspect research. Hough’s writing is clear and his conclusions believable
without the harsh and sometimes unfounded criticism that surfaced in
the last half of the 20th century.
CLARITY: 4
DONALD L. CRAIG University of Southern Mississippi (Jeff Kaufmann)
James, Edwin Oliver. Cremation and the Preservation
of the Dead in North America. American
Anthropologist 1928 Vol. 30:214-237
In this article, James examines the practice of cremation and the preservation
of the dead among the native North American peoples. He attempts to make
the connection between the two distinct practices and how they relate
to one anther, and as a result, how these practices associate the beliefs
and cultures between different North American peoples. James argues that
although different preservation methods and cremation practices started
out as specific to a certain people, through the process of migration
and travel, these practices shifted into new cultures, resulting in shared
and sometimes common customs among the deceased.
James recognizes that preservation methods such evisceration, embalmment,
mummy-bundles, and desiccation were among the first practices among the
North American peoples. These methods preserved the bodies of the dead
long past their deaths. The bodies were clad with ornamentation and often
times buried with their belongings and loved ones. These methods were
used in order to preserve the mortal remains so that the immortality
of the body might be secured. Sometimes the body was dried artificially
by smoking it over a fire.
In other areas of North America, James
found that partial cremation was performed. Some bodies were mummified,
and their heads burned. In other instances, the head of the deceased
was preserved and the body cremated. If the entire body was burned,
images of the deceased were made to represent their immortality. These
images
were treated as real. The images of the dead were eventually burned
and the spirit of the dead was ‘set free’. This suggests that there was
a vital connection between cremation and the preservation of the dead.
With the diffusion of culture through migration and racial mixture,
cult practices have constantly changed. Rituals have changed meaning,
so that the purpose of fires went from preserving the dead, to cremation,
to warm the mourners of dead, and accompany the ‘ghost’ to the spirit
world. Cremation was first used for the rulers, and was later used
for everybody. Data suggests that the practice of cremation grew from
attempts
to preserve the body, which later came second in the attainment of
the immortality of the soul.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
ASHLEY MCKINNON Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley)
James, Edwin Oliver. Cremation and the Preservation of the Dead
In North America. American Anthropologist 1928 Vol.
30: 214-242.
James decodes the various burial practices found among Native American
cultures before and after the contact period. He
finds that two main forms of mortuary ritual used in North America were preservation (through mummification)
and cremation. James believes
that mortuary practices underwent a shift from preservation to cremation
in pre-contact times. He credits
primary innovation and diffusion for the change from a mortuary practice
that centered on preserving the body for use in the afterlife to one
that included partial or complete destruction of the human vessel. James is also interested in how the mortuary
ritual of each culture bespeaks its supernatural beliefs.
James gives credit to the mechanisms of accidental (primary) innovation
and diffusion for the transition in practice and beliefs. Many of the body preservation rituals of
Native Americans involved desiccation by fire. This was usually accomplished with a system
of ropes that suspended the corpse over a fire. James hypothesizes that cremation may have
been accidentally invented when a body fell from the ropes into the fire. James
notes that cremation would have been a more practical option for nomadic
groups who spread the custom throughout the continent by way of diffusion. However,
he recognizes cremation would have had trouble diffusing into cultures
where the belief in preservation needs after death was important. By
the time this transition occurred, James believes that preservation of
mortal remains had secondary importance in immortality attainment for
the soul.
To support his thesis, James takes an holistic approach. He uses ethnographic fieldwork to infer the
belief systems of these Native American cultures. He turns to ethnohistorical accounts of missionaries
and explorers for descriptions of the mortuary rites. These ethnohistorical accounts also offer
evidence of the beliefs behind these practices. James used bioarchaeological evidence to
describe and understand the funerary rituals of North
America. This allows
him to assess the physical elements involved in the various processes,
and how each worked to meet the goal of preservation (either bodily or
through images of the dead).
James's article begins with a short introduction in which he outlines
the general problem. Most of the
article consists of detailed descriptions regarding the different mortuary
practices in addition to speculation on the belief systems involved. He also makes comparisons between the mortuary
methods used by various American Indians. This descriptive section is broken down into
the main categories of preservation and cremation. He divides the two categories of preservation
and cremation into sections also. The former is divided into evisceration,
embalmment, mummy-bundles and desiccation. The
latter is split into partial cremation and images of the dead.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
ERIN R. VILLARRAGA University of Southern
Mississippi (Jeff
Kaufmann)
Katz, Miton. Gnena in Southeastern Asia. American Anthropologist, July-September
1928 Vol. 30: 580-601.
Southeast Asia has a social-religious
complex termed, by English-speaking writers, Genna. Katz breaks down the Genna complex into three
subsets: the Kenna-Penna, the
social Genna, and the erection of memorials. Kenna
and Penna are a special form of taboo. Kenna is a type of “quarantine” where
a village, clan, family, or individual isolates themselves from certain
people for a described amount of time. Penna
is described as an “obligatory holiday,” where people abstain
from either all labors, or prescribed tasks. They both are associated with crises in life
(such as birth, puberty, marriage, and death), and periodical ceremonies. Genna
is a means of social advancement. It
involves a series of ceremonies and feasts. Monuments
are erected to “commemorate the performance of religious or social
Gennas, to recall a great feast, or to mark the grave of a rich or
distinguished man.”
Katz attempts to locate the cultural origins of the Genna complex by
analyzing the demographic use of the three subsets of the Genna complex
throughout Southeast Asia to discover
patterns of development and patterns of abandonment. He feels that the Genna rituals are old and
that newer developments are displacing the use of the Genna complex. Buddhism and Hinduism tend to diminish use
of Kenna-Penna and social Genna, but tend to foster the continuation
of erecting monuments. Katz analyzes
the influence of other cultures upon the Genna complex in a similar manner.
He concludes that the Genna originated with the Tibeto-Burman peoples. They
migrated into the area, which was occupied by the Mon-Khmer. The
Mon-Khmer practiced the Kenna-Penna and the Tibeto-Burman invaders assimilated
this practice. The practice of
erecting monuments came with migrations from the southern regions. As the three religious customs radiated throughout Southeast
Asia, the Tibeto-Burman peoples began to accept Buddhism
and Hinduism. So where they once had all three practices
they abandoned all but monument building. So
as of 1928, we have a hodgepodge of Genna beliefs throughout Southeast Asia.
CLARITY RANKING: 2
Jeremy Richards. Brigham Young University. (Julie Hartley).
Kissell, Mary Lois. The Early Geometric Patterned
Chilkat. American Anthropologist 1928 Vol.30:116-
Chilkats are blankets made in the Pacific north coast. They relate to
ceremonies and contain both geometric and animal ornament designs. Two
examples of the geometric pattern are known--one obtained by Captain
Swift in 1800, and another by early Russian explorers. They are now in
the Peabody Museum at Harvard University and
the National Museum in Copenhagen,
respectively. These use purely geometrical design and weave with different
colored strands. Distinguishing features also include things such as
a rectangular shape with no dipping curve, integral fringes, purely goat-wool
warp and a weave pattern related to older patterns. More striking is
the presence of geometric ornaments on primary and secondary stripes.
Such garments come from two places, namely Lynn Canal and Sitka.
A third web is a ceremonial tunic that uses both geometric designs as
well as animal medallions. It is in the Ottowa Museum in Canada. This uses latticed wrap
weave as well as tapestry twilled twine, which was developed
by the Tsimshian. This varies from the Tlingit example, where only the
latticed weave is used. The union of Tsimishian animal ornament and Tlingit
geometric design suggests that this particular garment is a transitional
type between the early and late Tlingit types, before these particular
Indians changed to a Tsimshian style of robe.
A fourth robe is found in the British Museum,
which was probably collected by the explorer Vancouver in Prince Edward Sound in
1794. It is Tlingit with geometric designIt is probably older than the
other robes and made by a tribe further south than the Chilkat.
The appearance of a slender band of yellow crossing the width of the
web and in the side fringes is interesting. It is also found among the
Bella Coola. On the Vancouver garment,
it takes a minor place in the decoration, but is possible a manifestation
of an older manner of indicating the principal figure, which had since
lost its significance.
Still, much is not known about early Tlingit weaving. Studies of weaving
are often left to ethnologists, whose lack of knowledge relating to weaving
lead them to make mistakes. Soon, the need for trained textile research
will be recognized.
CLARITY: 2
CHRIS VERMILLION Brigham Young University (Professor
Julie Hartley)
Kissell, Mary Lois. The Early Geometric Patterned
Chilkat. American Anthropologist. 1928: Vol.30 (1): 116-120.
The author’s objective is to relay the ethnographic importance of Chilkat
cultural textile industries. The article includes an in-depth analysis
of the manufacturing techniques and variations within the weaving patterns.
Kissell has based her research on the People of the North Pacific Coast,
and is based upon the recovery of an unidentified Chilkat ceremonial
robe. Regional and cultural characteristics, such as the use of animal
ornaments in Tlingit designs, are noted as an index of reference group
and ceremonial identification. The Chilkat-Tlingit ceremonial robes consist
of a unique weaving pattern similar to the technique used in basket-weaving.
The variations within manufacturing techniques allows for the distinction
between everyday-robes and those of ceremonial designation. The author
also gives a brief documentation of other-known ceremonial robes including
their historical acquisition and their present day locations.
The occurrence of similar manufacturing technology and decoration patterning
allows of the identification of cultural transitions and diffusion. The
reconstruction of stylized patterns assists in the reconstruction of
the chronology of the culture. The author notes the union of Tsimshian
animal ornament-decoration and the Tlingit geometric patterning as a
transitional stage between cultures.
The author stresses the lack of knowledge and applicable training within
the field of textile-based ethnography's. The article defines the patterning
of the robes, and provides the reader with a brief introduction into
the weaving techniques of the North Pacific Coast People.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
REBECCA PALMER University of British
Columbia. (John Barker)
Lavrischeff, Rev. T. I. Two Aleut Tales. American
Anthropologist 1928 Vol.30: 121-124.
"Two Aleut Tales" are a pair of stories recorded by
Rev. T. I. Lavrischeff in Ellamar Alaska from
the Aleut Indians. He was a Russian Orthodox priest in charge of the
Prince William Sound Area. Each story contains a moral lesson and reflects
Aleut views on family and society.
The first, titled "The Unfaithful Husband," is a story about
an adulterous old shaman named Akcheenkoo and his wife Eekakhlee. The
old man has the power to go into a trance and appear to be dead. Akcheenkoo
decides to use his ability to trick his wife into burying him in a
cave.
For three days, Eekakhlee returns to the cave to mourn her husband.
On the fourth day, she does not find him there. Through the aide of a
bird, she finds out that the old man is living on the other side of the
island with two young women. Eekakhlee is skeptical at first but the
bird persuades her to follow it to where the old man lives. She finds
the two attractive young girls preparing soup for the old man while he
is out fishing. Angrily she takes the soup pot and hits the girls in
the head, killing them both. Finished with that, she decides to manipulate
their bodies to look as if they are alive. She has one appear to be laughing
and the other scolding. The old woman hides behind a tree to await the
arrival of Akcheenkoo. When the old man comes back, he finds the two
girls apparently quarreling. He tries to resolve their argument by expressing
his love for both of them and offers them two otters that he killed.
This apparently is too much for Eekakhlee. Also possessing magical powers,
she turns herself into a bear and devours her husband.
I believe this story shows the importance the Aleut placed on marital
fidelity. This social norm parallels with many cultures. Published in
1928, this story was a clear illustration that many so-called primitive
cultures shared many of the same values of more modern societies.
The second story called "Old Man of Nutchek," is about
a rich man named Anoogne from the village of Nutchek who
has a large cache of food along with many valuable furs and clothing.
The people of Nutchek praise him because of his generosity in giving
feasts. One day as Anoogne is walking along the beach he slips on a dead
fish. He begins to complain bitterly when a voice from the heavens tells
him to not complain, that without the fish it provided for him he would
starve. The voice is a spiritual entity that never identifies itself,
but seems to have power in providing the Aleut with the food they need.
Anoogne, in his pride, tells the voice that he has stores enough to last
him a very long time. The voice counters telling him that he could send
snow to cover the earth and freeze everything. Anoogne mocks the voice;
he does not believe the voice can do what it says. No reply comes. Shortly
thereafter snow begins to fall. It continues until it covers the whole
island. Anoogne is not able to shovel fast enough to keep it from freezing
his food storage. The frozen food is like white paper and provides no
nourishment. Anoogne begins to starve and confesses his sin to the people.
The snow covers the island for twenty-four months. All living creatures
perish. The voice comes again telling Anoogne not to curse fate. He confesses
his sin to the villagers. The pride of Anoogne brings about the downfall
of the whole village.
I believe this story clearly illustrates Aleut attitudes towards wealth
and the danger of pride. It demonstrates the respect the Aleut held for
the forces of nature. It also shows the importance of being grateful
for what the earth provides.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
JOHN EDVALSON Brigham Young University (Juile
R. Hartley)
Lavrischef, Rev. T.I. Two Aleut Tales. American
Anthropologist. Vol. 30(1):121-124.
The article consists of two, relatively brief Aleut tales. The article
does not contain an ethnographic sketch of the People, and it does
not contain an interpretation as to the context and meaning of the tales.
The author does not distinguish whether these tales were an important
aspect of an oral tradition, and he does not note their cultural relevance.
The stories are not placed within a social or historical context. The
first tale within the article, named "Unfaithful Husband",
tells the story of an old man and his attempt to rid himself of his wife.
Staging his own death, he allows for his wife t mourn alongside his burial
place for three days before he rises and disappears. The man is punished
for his actions once the wife discovers the truth of his deceit. The
second tale, "Old Man of Nutchek", is a tale of egotism and
the disrespect of nature. The man, though respectful and giving to
the people of the village, disrespects the ancestor spirits. He is
forced
to suffer the consequences of his actions as he freezes to death alone
in his cabin. The two stories are fables; they convey a moral-message
and are part of cultural mythology and legendry.
The author does not place the tales into a cultural context. The reader
must use secondary sources in order to establish the cultural relevance
of these tales.
CLARITY RANKING: 5
REBECCA PALMER University of British
Columbia. (John Barker)
Linton, Ralph. Culture Areas in Madagascar.
American Anthropologist, July-September 1928 Vol. 30: pg. 363-390.
Madagascar is
a very diverse island. Although it is unified by one national language,
it varies culturally and geographically from region to region. This article
was written in attempt to correct the inaccurate assertion made by many
writers that culture is uniform throughout Madagascar. The author, Ralph Linton,
carefully analyzes the lifestyles of the peoples of Madagascar and
divides them into three distinct regions: the East Coast, the Plateau,
and the West Coast and extreme South. He acknowledges the differences
of each region in support of his argument that the island of Madagascar is
not unified by one common culture.
The area defined by Linton as the East Coast region is the narrow strip
along the eastern coast which extends nearly the length of the entire
island. In this area, common dress for men are clothes similar to that
of a poncho, with a sleeveless piece of cloth open at the sides. The
women wear a straight, tubular garment reaching form the armpit to the
knee. Exposure of genitalia is not uncommon in the East Coast region.
Unity among tribes is important to the inhabitants of this region of Madagascar, and the king is the
social and political head of the tribe.
The second region classified by Linton is the Plateau, which encompasses
the entire central portion of the island and has a average elevation
of 3,000 feet. Unlike the East Coast region, exposure is uncommon in
the Plateau area and only infants are seen nude in public. The societal
leader of the particular area is the king, who is an absolute monarch
with complete power over the lives and the property of his subjects.
The final of the cultural areas defined by Linton is the West Coast
and extreme south region. In this part of the island, rainfall is scarce
and the climate is excessively hot. Consequently, much of the land is
deserted and villages are many miles apart. Along the coast, men typically
wear skirts and carefully avoid exposure while women do not avoid appearing
in public while not fully-clothed. Similar to the kings in the Plateau
region, the kings of the West Coast are absolute monarchs and receive
portions of the fines imposed by the supreme court and also receive tributes
from their subjects.
Although the three areas share some commonalities, they are vastly different
from one another. As Linton argues, the island is not, contrary to common
belief, unified by one universal Malagasy culture.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
IAN DAVIS. Brigham Young University.
(Julie Hartley).
Linton, Ralph. Culture Areas in Madagascar. American
Anthropologist, 1928 Vol.30 (3); 363-390
The author of this article, Ralph Linton, contests the idea of cultural
uniformity in Madagascar.
He points out that all the authors who have written about Madagascar do
not recognize that there are cultures in the area other than the one
that they have seen. He assumes that this mistake comes from the fact
that few Europeans have knowledge of the whole island of Madagascar,
and he points out three distinctive culture areas in Madagascar that
suggest a lack of cultural uniformity.
He divides the culture of Madagascar into
three groups, based on geographical, climatic, and cultural distinctions.
He calls these areas "the East Coast," "the Plateau," and "the
West Coast and Extreme South." He provides a mass of information
for each culture area, including geography, climate, material culture,
social organization, religion, disposal of the dead and art. He also
describes the distinctions of each culture area. He not only points
out the differences between these areas, but also shows which characteristics
are influenced by which area.
The mass of details is illustrated with a strong influence of American
diffusionism. Linton emphasizes the cultural distinctions in Madagascar but
also he describes where these cultural traits originated and how neighboring
cultures influences them.
His purpose of this article is made very clear at the beginning and
at the end; however, too much information can obscure the main idea and
confuse the readers.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
YUKIKO KASAHARA University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Loeb, Edwin M. Mentawei Social Organization. American
Anthropologist 1928 Vol. 30: 408-433.
The social organization of Pageh in Mentawei Island is
presented in this article. The author explains that readers need to
know about material cultures and religions to understand Mentawei social
organization.
Therefore, the type of house and its use, clothing, weapons, body decorations
such as filed teeth and tattooing, and spiritual ideology are briefly
described as important elements of understanding Mentawei social organization.
The author also argues about "punen", the religious
ceremony of people of a communal house (uma), and "lia",
the family religious festival, as well as marriages and childbirth
and the taboos and rules associating with these events.
The author; however, puts more focus on terminology to picture the social
organization of Mentawei Island.
The author addresses issues such as how the members of kin are referred
to, and how these terms are related to their relationships. For instance,
the children of two brothers call each other brother and sister and
they are not supposed to marry. On the other hand, the children of
two sisters
and of a brother and a sister do not call each other brother and sister.
Therefore, they can marry but it is not favorable to do so. He also
gives detailed descriptions about personal names. He discusses how
and when
the new born babies are named, the meaning of the name, and how people
change or "lose" their names as a result of social changes
such as the death of a member of the kinship group.
In addition to social organization in Mentawei Island,
the author shows where the cultural traits of Pageh originated and how
they were diffused. At the beginning of the article, the author mentions
some Hindu influences in the Mentawei culture. In the middle of this
article, he explains the similarities and differences in other cultural
areas of Mentawei Island. He also compares them to Polynesian,
Melanesian, Malayan, Indonesian and other Asian cultures to find out
the origin and the flow of cultural traits as they reached Mentawei Island.
He gives little interpretation and generalization despite a mass of
information. Therefore, this article is open ended without solid
conclusions. However, since he clearly implies his ideas in the information
that
he presents, the article succeeds in leading readers to the same conclusions
as the author’s.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
YUKIKO KASAHARA University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
.gif)
Loeb, E.M. Mentawei Social Organization American Anthropologist, 1928. Volume 30 (4) 408-433
The Mentawei Islands are located in an isolated portion of Polynesia,
situated just west of Sumatra. An anthropologist by the name of Edwin M.
Loeb began studying the culture of the Mentawei in 1926, and has since
published several articles relating to the rituals and practices of their
customs. The Mentawei’s
way of life can simply be defined using only two words: religion and
survival.
The Mentawei religion is based primarily on the belief and fear of spirits,
souls, and ghosts. Rituals are
consistently made to avoid sickness and death. It is believed that spirits
and ghosts alone cause illness or any other misfortune, and sacrifices
are made to stave off unwanted complications and ensure health and longevity. The
sacrifices are made in special religious festivals such as Punen or when
erecting a new building. When
an animal is sacrificed its liver is placed onto an altar to call on
spirits that will protect the village or family. The
spirits don’t eat the liver; they eat the soul so it will not
bring any hardships to the village. The
structure of the religion is made up of two different orders of priests. The first priest, or rimata, completes all
of the sacrifices for the souls of the community. The other is the house father, who also makes
sacrifices just for the members of his family. Priests are very important to the Mentawei
but the Shaman is considered to be the most important person within the
community. He is capable of communicating
with spirits and diagnosing severe illness or disease. Only the Shaman can see the ghosts so his
status is ranked very high among the Islanders.
Everything in Mentawei culture correlates in one way or another with
their religious practices. The
festivals are all linked with religion and the most important of the
festivals is called Punen. Punen
is held on occasion when there is a new priest, an epidemic infiltrates
a village, blood is shed within a village, a new house is built, or a
tree has fallen on the ground. The festival is started by the ritual of
washing hair by everyone in the village. All
physical labor within the village stops and several ceremonial sacrifices
take place throughout Punen. During
the festival prohibitions are made regarding physical contact between
husbands and wives. Men are to
sleep in separate houses away fro women because any type of fornication
is taboo.
The Mentawei people are entirely monogamous and emphasize a great deal
of importance on marriage and family. Before
a couple is married there are two stages that must be completed before
the ceremony can take place. During
the first stage the couple may sleep together but not eat with one another. Any
children born before marriage are adopted by the woman’s father
or the woman’s uncle. When
a couple is engaged the implication is marriage and any adultery from
that time is highly frowned upon. At
one point in Mentawei history adultery was punished by death. Before
a man can marry he must establish his own banana field and build a house. On
the day of the wedding hair is ceremonially washed just as it is during
Punen. The ceremony is directed by the grooms brother
and the bride is escorted by the grooms brothers wife. After the wedding has taken place it would
be a sin if the husband and wife didn’t were to miss a meal of
eating together.
The Mentawei culture is a completely self-sufficient community that
has lived that way for centuries. As
unique as the culture may be it still has been influenced by outside
sources. But even with Christian
influence the Mentawei has been able to keep the keystone to their culture,
their religion.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
Brandon Henscheid Brigham Young University (Julie Hartley)
Lowie, Robert H. Edward Sandford Burgess. American
Anthropologist, 1928. Vol.30:481-482.
This is an obituary for Edward Sandford Burgess, one of the founders
of the American Anthropological Association. He died February 23, 1928.
Lowie elaborates Burgess’ contributions to and importance in the field
as is expected from an obituary. For Burgess, anthropology was more of
a side-interest than a main vein of study, however he made significant
contributions through lifelong interest. He was the first to encourage
anthropological instruction in a women’s colege, and was a great ethnographic
recorder. His primary interests were botany and science, which he taught
for several years. He studied the Romansch people of Switzerland and
always tried to encourage the rising generation to view liberally the
racial strains meeting in New
York City at the time.
Lowie presents a stirring claim as to Burgess’ good character, "a
felicitous blend of scholarly devotion and character." He writes
that Burgess would be a fine character to be an example for younger
generations, and writes that those who knew him would never forget
him.
CLARITY: 5
MCKENNA WOODGER Brigham Young University (J.R.
Hartley).
Lowie, Robert H. Edward
Sandford Burgess. American
Anthropologist 1928 Vol. 30:481-482.
Dr. Edward Sandford Burgess was an educator, botanist, and anthropologist.
He was born on January 19, 1855, in Little Valley, New York, and died
on February 23, 1928, in New
York City. In this 1928 obituary, the anthropologist
Robert Lowie wrote a glowing account of the life and work of one of the
founders of the American Anthropological Association.
Edward Burgess spent his professional life as a teacher. He first taught
high-school botany at Central High
School in Washington, D. C., and later taught
at John Hopkins. In 1895 he became a professor of biological sciences
at Hunter College in New York City. It was at Hunter College where
Dr. Burgess became one of the first educators to introduce regular anthropology
instruction in a college for women.
Dr. Burgess taught many courses through the biology department, including
Primitive Man, Language and Race, and Prehistoric Man. He
also taught courses on Primitive Mediterranean Civilization and Ethnology
and Culture of China and Japan. He had
a keen insight into human problems, and held a sympathetic view to the
racial issues of New York City.
He was primarily a botanist and published several works including History
of Pre-Clusian Botany in 1902 and Species and Variations of
Biotian Asters in 1906. Later in life his studies turned to anthropology.
His interests included the Romantsch people of southeastern Switzerland,
American Indian lore, and primitive craftsmanship.
Dr. Burgess’ interests and expertise were widespread. Lowie called him
a “student of the universe, with a loving absorption in all its manifestations” (482). Dr.
Burgess’ life and career were full and Lowie recalled him with affection
and admiration.
CLARITY: 5
DONALD L. CRAIG University of Southern Mississippi (Jeff Kaufmann)
Lowie, Robert H. A Note on Relationship Terminologies.
American Anthropologist 1928 Vol.30: 263-267.
This is a brief discussion on Lewis Henry Morgan’s Systems of Consanguinity
and Affinity of the Human Family. Robert Lowie felt compelled to
respond to Morgan’s analysis of relationship systems and kinship terminologies.
Within the realm of nomenclature or clans and tribes, consanguinity
or genetic relationship refers to individuals who have at least one
common ancestor in the preceding few generations. There are two major
types of relationship systems. Descriptive systems reject classification
of kindred, while classificatory systems reject descriptive phrases
to avoid creating "arbitrary generalizations." Morgan believed
that primitive systems were classificatory, and civilized systems were
descriptive. Lowie pointed out a flaw in Morgan’s dichotomy that these
two systems are not "hand-in-hand" but "belong in different
logical universes."
A.L. Kroeber stated that kinship terminologies are not so many coherent "systems." In
logical universe systems there is no distinction from a mother or aunt,
only classified as elder female. Nor is there one for son or nephew,
only younger male. Father and uncle are distinguished by "bifurcate
collateral." The collateral criterion rests on the distinction between
siblings and lineal relatives. Grouping lineal and collateral relatives
under the same term is called "merging." In kinship systems
the relatives most frequently merged are a parent and sibling of the
same sex, a sibling and parallel cousin, or a son or daughter.
The following is a list of possible guidelines:
Uncles and aunts may be treated as parents.
The paternal uncle may be classed with the father, while the maternal
uncle is designated by a specific term; and, correspondingly, the maternal
aunt may be classed with the mother, while the paternal aunt has a specific
designation.
The paternal and maternal uncle (or aunt) are alike distinguished from
the parents and each other.
The paternal and maternal uncle (or aunt) are alike distinguished from
the parent, but bear a joint uncle (or aunt) designation.
Bifurcate Merging recognizes that relatives may be traced through either
a male or female connecting relative. It is a kinship system in which
there are no distinctions based on certain lineal and collateral relatives,
as when a father and the father’s brother are both called "father." Through
his work, Morgan stressed the genetic relationship of generations,
combined with this idea of bifurcation.
CLARITY RANKING: 1
SAMUEL QUINTA Brigham Young University.
(Dr. Julie Hartley)
Lowie, Robert H. A Note on Relationship Terminologies. American
Anthropologist, 1928 Vol.30:
263-267.
Lowie considers two kinship terms originally introduced by Lewis H.
Morgan. He explains that the
terms “descriptive” and “classificatory” are
used by Morgan to describe how differing cultures may apply kinship
meaning. Lowie’s
understanding of these terms seems to be based on cultural considerations
rather than the more biological perspective taken by Morgan.
Descriptive, according to Morgan, is associated with actual blood affiliation
of family groups. Classificatory
is concerned with the general classification of a group type, seemingly
regardless of blood affiliation. Lowie argues that this paradigm does not
accurately explain terminologies used in kinship systems. In accordance with an explanation given by
Rivers, Lowie explains that “descriptive” terms may be better understood
as “denotative.” That is, there
is not a direct correlation between blood relationship and the term “descriptive,” but
an inclination to use terms that only reflect connections, and not
necessarily a blood relationship.
Further, Lowie explains that the term “classificatory” can not be paired
with, or balanced against, the term “descriptive.” The terms have different realms of kinship
ascription. “Classificatory” is
described as being singular in description, naming individual groups
of relationship. Specifically,
the terms are used to put relative types together. “Descriptive” (or
denotative) terms illustrate actual relationships between individuals
in a unilinear relationship.
Lowie elucidates his points by listing possibilities surrounding the
relationships of individuals of one ascending generation. In addition, he utilizes ideas obtained from
his work with Iroquois in his argument.
CLARITY: 3
DALE NORTON University of Southern Mississippi (Jeff Kaufmann)
Macleod, Christie William. Economic Aspects
of Indigenous American Slavery. American Anthropologist Vol. 30,632-650.
It is my understanding that Macleod’s article sets out to demonstrate
the elaborateness of slavery that was indigenous (original) to the Americas.
The first part of Macleod’s article covers a wide range of reasons why
a person can become enslaved. For example, Mayan’s were enslaved if they
were unable to pay a debt. However, relatives could pay off someone’s
debts if they were willing. In the Valley of Mexico people
sold themselves into slavery if they felt they were unable to provide
enough food to survive. In the Aztec culture a traitor’s descendents
could be enslaved until their fifth generation.
Part way through the article Macleod shifts his focus to chattel slavery.
This is where an individual owns the person enslaved. In this situation
the men were usually sacrificed, whereas women and children were either
made slaves for life or adopted by their "masters."
Supposedly there are accounts from colonizers that suggest those Indians
who went too far from home were fair game for enslavement. Spanish colonists
were shocked to discover the vast amount of slaves in the company of
the Creek. De Soto found
some slaves with mutilated feet, in order to keep them from running away.
Slaves were used in many economic aspects of indigenous American life
such as: maple-sugar making, wild rice gathering, firewood collecting,
water carrying, hunting, fieldwork, and gardening (p. 641)
Macleod surmises that the indigenous American Slavery was well underway
before any kind of European influence. The Slave Trade, Macleod suggests,
came about because of the need to put distance between the slaves and
their homes and it was not a direct result of contact with Europeans.
CLARITY 3
SUMMER FENSTERMAKER-PIERCE Brigham Young University.
(Dr. Julie Hartley)
Macleod, William Christie. Economic
Aspects of Indigenous American Slavery. American
Anthropologist, 1928. Vol. 30:
632-50.
For the indigenous American cultures slavery was a common practice that
arose of two conditions: the need to relieve an individual of financial
or moral debt, debtor slavery, or by capture or hereditary ownership,
chattel slavery. As proposed by
the author the terms and construct of slavery was a complex social and
political structure indicative of the appropriating society. It is his
further contention that although there was economic rationale for the
slave workforce of the plantations in the Northeast Americas established
by Europeans, that the institution of slavery for indigenous populations
was less for sustenance and more for community support and the maintenance
of moral good. With in depth analysis of regional communities he author
isolates the subjects of slavery and their treatment within each community
referencing his prior works. He theorizes about the value and purpose
of slavery to the indigenous cultures, supporting his assertions with
both primary sources, recounts from explorers and slave members of particular
communities, and secondary sources, the works of two historians, Cogolludo
and Gomara.
He concludes that the slaves, who performed duties that ranged from
maple-sugar making and firewood collecting to gardening, maintained a
level of prestige for the owner important in all the indigenous communities. Furthermore, the potential monetary value
of a slave attained through trade in all communities could lead not only
to improved wealth, but possibly improved status. The author focuses on the Northwest coast
communities that proved to attain significant economic strength from
the trade of slaves to outside communities. It
is the effort displayed by the raids of neighboring communities and public
sale of persons that indicate the slave to be of economic value to the
coastal people. The trade held both at public auction and privately,
was explained by primary sources, to achieve economic gain and to establish
distance between the captive and his relatives.
The monetary affiliation between the communities and the slave trade
are comparable to the plantation slave trade yet prove not to indicate
European influence. It is evident,
instead, that the indigenous American populations had already embraced
the institution of slavery as both a social regulation and economic finance
before European discourse.
CLARITY: 2
SUZANNE DEMAS, Barnard College (Paige
West)
Macleod, W.C. "Jumping Over" From
West Africa to South America. American
Anthropologist, 1928. Vol.30:107-111.
Macleod, during casual reading and research finds a pattern of traditions
that include stepping over the legs of either women or corpses. He researches
the issue because he notices instances of this ranging from Africa to
throughout the Americas.
Macleod believes that he has found the remains of a "Paleolithic" religious
concept, meaning that the various forms of stepping or jumping over,
as a religious base, have existed since the Stone Age. These forms
have evolved and changed over time, and now symbolize everything from
death
to sexual intercourse in different societies. He needs to find evidence
of this religious tradition in a few additional societies before he
can generalize the concept.
He first came across the evidence when reading about war practices in Africa and noted the peculiar custom. When he heard,
several years later, of similar traditions in America, he began looking for evidences
more closely. He found evidence of a similar dance among the Kutchin
of Alaska, the neighboring Kwakiutl, the Hupa of California, the Ojibwa
of the Great Lakes and their Winnebago
neighbors. The Delaware Heckewelder, Indians of the Virginia Piedmont,
tribes of the Guianas, and the Arawaks all adhere to similar traditions
and practices. In several of the cultures the dance had sexual meaning,
and stepping over a woman was considered akin to intercourse.
In most of the tribes the dance was tied in with death, either as a
matter of respect or of getting out of the duties of marriage vows. This
showed respect in place of a eulogy, in recognition that the forefathers
had been holy and that the ground they touched was holy, therefore they
should step over this holy ground as an act of deference. By stepping
over the legs of a dead husband a woman was freed to remarry, otherwise
she would be bound to the dead for life.
It is taboo to step over graves other than during the funeral ceremonies
and has even taken different forms of tabooing stepping over children
for fear of stunting their growth. In some cultures the act of stepping
over can be retracted by stepping back over the way you have come.
He found data from Jewish and Irish communities, but all of the references
found included warnings against jumping over. He suspects there is more
information available for the Old and New Worlds and had not ruled out
the prospect of doing field research on the topic. He hopes that the
origin/history of this ceremonial action will eventually be discovered.
If evidence can be found among the Patagonians, the Bushmen and the Australians,
then, according to Macleod, it can be proven as dating from the Stone
Age. He also gives an example of how the practice has influenced Western
culture, in the form on a well-known nursery rhyme; the cow jumping over
the moon.
CLARITY: 4
MCKENNA WOODGER Brigham Young University (J.R.
Hartley).
Macleod, W.C. "Jumping Over" From
West Africa to South America. American
Anthropologist January, 1928 Vol.30(1): 107-111.
The author of this short, descriptive article is fascinated by the cross-culture
practice of either superstitiously jumping over things, or avoiding jumping
over things, which, according to his research, is a common practice in
many ceremonial complexes. He first noticed this custom in an African
warrior ritual, wherein warriors who are leaving for battle run toward
the women of their group and once they are approaching the women, the
women all quickly lie down, and the men jump over them. It was important
for the men to jump over them successfully as any man unable to make
the jump, it is believed, will not survive the battle. Further observation
of cultures in America, and Europe revealed
the prevalence of similar practices. For example, Macleod quotes Teit’s
description of the Thompson River Indians of the British Columbia plateau: "Children
whose mother had died, were made to jump four times over the mother’s
corpse," (pg.108).
The article is organised as a list of some of the cultures where "jumping
over" (or the inverted practice of jumping over avoidance) is practiced,
and although there is a short description of each of the unique customs,
the article provides no analysis of the practice in general. Also, the
links, if any, between the cultures that he lists is not apparent, which
weakens his overall presentation of the material, and restricts his flow
of ideas. In the first paragraph, the author makes two vague and seemingly
contradictory remarks attempting to explain the reason why this practice
is observed cross continentally. He suggests that there may be a "genetic
relationship" accounting for the distribution of such a cultural
phenomena. He also suggests that it may be the result of diffusion. The
article, however, does not develop either of these ideas. The reader
quickly realises that the article is not intended to provide any kind
of analysis or conclusion. This article describes, in a reduced, or summarised
form some of the author’s preliminary research. Macleod successfully
presents many snap-shots of ethnographic curiosities in a short amount
of space.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
EMILY HERTZMAN: University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Mathiassen, Therkel. Norse Ruins in Labrador? American
Anthropologist 1928 Vol. 30:569-579
Mathiassen’s article Norse Ruins in Labrador? is based
on disproving: “the common assumption that if something is repeated enough,
it becomes fact” (569). Through step-by-step analysis, Mathiassen successfully
disproved the notion of Norse occupation within the Labrador Islands. His theory, tested through
analysis of history, folklore, and archaeology, is that the Norse may
have visited the area but did not settle there.
The historical evidence was a series of documents describing Norse explorer’s
comments of sailing to a land where no grass grew; glaciers were seen
inland and the land, “did not seem to them to have any value” (569).
Further investigation of the documents concluded no mention of occupation.
Mathiassen's thoroughness crossed over to the ‘folklore’ evidence with
similar results. It seems that Norse people were actually a separate
Eskimo hunting tribe that utilized the area in the summer. Locals believed
there were nomadic Eskimo with little knowledge of the local environment,
adaptation, and successful hunting/fishing techniques. The discrepancies
in identification were the fault of the local missionaries who confused
the visiting Tunnit tribe as Greenlanders. Mathiassen concluded that
there was no connection through folklore between the lost Norse tribes
of Greenland and of the Tunnit Eskimo.
Perhaps Mathiassen’s most brilliant point is through investigation of
the archaeological evidence. The Norse ruins were in fact, characteristic
of old Eskimo summer dwellings. The ruins were situated on cliffs facing
the sea, built of heavy stones, and had strong tent rings and meat
caches associated with old Eskimo culture. Further investigation of grave
lengths
and markers concluded that all the culture traits were Eskimo and not
of Norse origin. By combining history, folklore, and archaeology, Mathiassen
found no evidence of Norse occupation on the Labrador islands.
CLARITY RANKING: 5
KELLY MCCLAVE University of
Southern Mississippi (Jeff
Kaufmann)
.gif)
Mathiassen, Therkel. Norse Ruins in Labrador? American Anthropologist, 1928. Volume 30 (4): 569-579.
In this article, Therkel Mathiassen addresses the issue of the Norse
ruins in Labrador and if they can be
regarded as Norse in origin. Many
people believed the ruins, distinct from the local Eskimo ruins, to be
of Norse origin. However, Mathiassen argues that the ruins
can be attributed to the lost Thule culture
in the Arctic. He
deals with this issue in three ways: through historical evidence, local Eskimo
folklore, and archaeological evidence.
To begin with, Mathiassen provides evidence from the Saga of Erik the Red and other Norse historical accounts. Though these accounts record that the Norsemen
were clever sailors and may have ventured to Labrador,
he argues that it does not prove that the ruins are Norse. History therefore
cannot solve the question or prove that the ruins are Norse in origin.
Mathiassen next explores the folklore from the local Eskimos in Labrador. Eskimo
tales of a strange people referred to as the Tunnit, seem to prove that
the Norse were these people. However,
the Tunnit legends include other possibilities as well, including Indians
and strange Eskimos. All three
peoples offer a possible explanation to the identity of the Tunnit. The description of the Tunnit, though, seems
to describe an Eskimo-like people and not the Norsemen. Mathiassen concludes that folklore does not
indicate that the Norsemen were the Tunnit and that the ruins were Norse.
Lastly, Mathiassen examines the archaeological evidence. The supposed Norse remains have many features,
such as usually being situated on the most exposed side of islands, containing
strong tent rings, built of heavy stones without interval, and several
other features. In summarizing
the work of other anthropologists, Mathiassen argues that the archaeological
evidence points to the Thule culture as
the architects of the ruins in Labrador. The Tunnit sites seem to resemble the summer
encampments of the Thule culture in the
Central Eskimo areas of the Arctic and
not the Norse.
In summary, Mathiassen concludes that neither history, folklore, nor
archaeological evidence shows that the ruins are Norse. The ruins, he believes belongs to the lost Thule culture from the Central Arctic.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
ERIN CHAPMAN Brigham Young University (Julie Hartley)
Morice, A.G. "The Fur Trader in
Anthropology: And a Few Related Questions." American Anthropologist
March, 1928 Vol 30 (1): p 60-84.
Morice writes this article as a rebuttal against W. C. McLeod’s criticism
(American Anthropologist 1926: 566-577) of his own criticism (American
Anthropologist 1925: 478-482) of McLeod’s article "Certain Mortuary
Aspects of Northwest Coast Culture" (American Anthropologist 1925:
122-150). McLeod claimed that the Sékanais Indians of the northern
interior of British Columbia practiced
cremation, but Morice insists that though their westerly neighbors,
the Carrier, practice cremation, the Sékanais never did. Morice complains
that McLeod based his criticism on the journal of Daniel William Harmon,
a fur trader who never learned to speak the Sékanais language, and that
McLeod himself does not speak Sékanais and has never lived among them
for an extended period of time. He contrasts this with his own familiarity
with the Sékanais language and his nineteen-year experience living near
the Sékanais as a Catholic missionary.
Morice contends that Harmon and other fur traders stationed in that
area are unreliable. He shows several instances where he claims they
misrepresented the language, religion, and customs of the Carrier and
Sékanais and the geography of the land they live in. He also questions
how well Harmon’s journal is preserved in the published text, noting
that Daniel Haskel had "written it over." He even suggests
that passages about scalping in the Harmon book were inserted by "his
censor or editor" claiming "he must have known better."
Morice then argues that Harmon’s book actually supports his own view.
He cites a passage that says that the Sékanais bury their dead, while
the Carriers burn their dead. However, he ultimately argues that the
Sekanais did not bury their dead either until they fell under the influence
of Europeans, but rather left their bodies in the open air. He bases
this claim on his personal conversations with Sékanais elders and the
writings of French Catholic missionaries who preceded him. He notes that
the one instance in Harmon’s book where a Sékanais man is cremated occurred
in a Carrier village, though McLeod said the village was Sékanais. He
defends his assertion in a pervious work that the cremated Sékanais man
must have been married to Carrier women, though Harmon’s work never states
this. Morice conjectures that the Sékanais man was cremated by supposed
Carrier in-laws.
He explains that the Carrier cremate their dead because they had more
contact with coastal groups than the Sékanais. Both the Carrier and the
Sékanais belong to the Déné language group. Before the Déné were influenced
by costal Indians, Morice argues, they were "living relics of primitive
society" with little government, few ceremonies, no settled villages,
and a "patriarchal" family system in which lineage was traced
through male lines. In this pristine condition, the Déné always left
their dead in the open air. However, Morice contends, the Déné are naturally
receptive of foreign traditions. The Carrier who live close to costal
Indians therefore adopted the culture of their neighbors, becoming a
matriarchal (female lineage) society with chiefs, elaborate ceremonies,
and villages. They likewise copied their neighbors by cremating their
dead. However the Sékanais, who were relatively isolated from costal
people, had few of these practices and continued to leave their dead
in the open until they adopted the European practice of burial.
CLARITY RANKING: 2
CLAY LARSON Brigham Young University (Dr.
J.R. Hartley)
Morice, A.G. Summary of "The Fur Trader
in Anthropology: And a Few Related Questions." American Anthropologist
March, 1928 Vol 30 (1): p 60-84.
This article is mainly a response to another work by W.C. McLeod. Morice
had extensive experience living with the Ameri-Indians of that area and
learned their language, while McLeod, who apparently has little or no
experience with the tribes in question, relies on the journals of furs
and traders to make his arguments and conclusions. Morice deals with
the reliability of people with long term, but only surface experience
with a group, and the superiority of field experience over records made
by others.
Morice’s first point is that an anthropologist cannot absolutely rely
on accounts by fur traders, at least the fur trader’s records concerning
the Ameri-Indians of the Canadian Rockies area. To prove his point, Morice
cites various problems with the geographical, sociological, and ethnographic
statements of these traders, refuting with his own experience and ethnographic
studies of the tribes in question. For example, Morice refutes one fur
trader’s claim that the Carriers (a Canadian Rockies tribe) was totally
ignorant of medicinal herbs and roots, which Morice refutes by citing
an earlier article on Carrier medicine.
Morice, in the remainder of the article, rebuts the conclusions McLeod
makes with the flawed data of the fur traders. Morice refutes McLeod’s
claim that the Sékanais tribe (another native group residing in the Canadian
Rockies) did not practice cremation. He again disproves this by citing
his own experience and interviews with his native contacts. Finally,
the Déné (a group of tribes in the same region) were a culturally adaptable
group that absorbed the customs and social traditions of whatever group
was close to them. He establishes this point by comparing the cultural
practices of Déné speaking groups with their neighboring tribes and found
that these Déné groups almost entirely copied the cultures of their these
tribes while retaining the Déné language. At the end of the article,
McLeod’s claims seem totally refuted.
CLARITY RANKING: 5
NATHAN TOLMAN Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley)
Morice, A.G. The Fur Trader
In Anthropology: And A Few Related Questions. American
Anthropologist, 1928 Vol.
30:60-84.
The general concern of this article is directed toward correcting assertions
made by previous contributors to American Anthropologist regarding several
Dene groups (North American Native Americans). Father
Morice contends that one mistaken contributor used the inappropriately
edited journals of a fur trader as a primary source of field data. The
author discusses how in his experience fur traders did not adequately
know the language of the peoples with whom they did business. The author
presents himself as a highly educated priest with linguistic training
who has lived among several Dene groups for extended periods and has
fully mastered their languages. He also discusses how the fur trader's
relationship with Native Americans - often exploitative and contemptuous, affected their interaction with those peoples.
The author discusses the challenges of truly coming to know another
people and the many opportunities for error, misunderstanding and deception such entails. His discussion shows
his intelligence and experience and makes his assertions more credible,
which of course is his purpose. From his discussion and the references
therein he is apparently widely published on Native American anthropology
and has also read widely on such.
Through out the article Father Morice painstakingly discusses many points
related to Dene language, burial treatment, socio-political organization
and temperament. The primary ethnographic fact he wants made clear is
which tribes practiced sky-burial and which ones practiced cremation.
He also describes some of the interactions occurring between Native American
groups as they are impacted by Euro-American expansion.
The author lived among the Dene as a missionary. His judgment as to
their moral behavior clearly shows his religious perspective. His paternalistic
view of Native Americans is blatant: "...it must be understood that
the Indian being a grown-up child..." (65). Lastly, much of the
article is concerned with relaying information that supports then popular
diffusionist theories.
CLARITY: 3
PETER BREEDEN University of Southern Mississippi (Jeff Kaufmann)
Parsons, Elsie Clews. Notes On The Pima. American
Anthropologist Vol. 30, 445-464.
Elsie Clews Parson’s article criticizes Russell for his lack of attention
when studying the kinship system of the Pimans in early nineteen
hundreds. Parsons gives us an extensive account of family relations among
the
Pima through her explanation of Kin, Clan, and Moiety.
Kin
Family relations (kin) in Piman society are traced bilaterally. This
means that familial lines are traced through one’s father as well as
mother. Surprisingly, there are no specific responsibilities or rites
that are practiced during significant points in one’s life such as
birth, puberty, marriage, or death.
Pima family terminology is based on the standards of descent and seniority.
The way Pima’s are classified in their familial roles might have
nothing to do with actual social organization.
Clan
In Pima society men are called by the name of their clan. Clans are
traced through the line of the father (paternally) and serve no other
function. Even if you belong to the same clan as someone you are not
considered kin if you are more than five generations outside of the relationship.
Moiety
Piman social organization is made up of five clans that are grouped
by moiety. Moiety is the same term that is used in reference to cross-cousins
which are the children of your mother’s brother or father’s sister.
Moiety means that the society is divided into two halves. In the case
of the
Piman, this division is between the Buzzard moiety and the Coyote moiety.
Each moiety expresses the cohesiveness of the group through bragging
rites. This bragging or thoughts of superiority toward the other moiety
usually ends in hair pulling.
In the rest of the article Parson’s focus is on the comparison of the
Piman and Pueblo culture.
For example, there were various Pueblo ceremonies that were highly organized
unlike the Pima who had very few ceremonies. However, both the Pueblo and the Pima held
the belief that mammals, birds, and insects both caused and cured sickness.
Through studying the Pueblo and
Pima culture Parsons comes up with a very Boasian realization: in order
to truly appreciate or understand aspects of a particular Indian culture,
one must analyze those aspects within their own cultural context.
CLARITY 3
SUMMER FENSTERMAKER-PIERCE Brigham Young University.
(Dr. Julie Hartley)
Parsons, Elsie Clews. Notes on the Pima. American
Anthropologist 1928 Vol.30: 445-464.
This article is a cultural comparison between Pima and the Pueblo. According to
the description written by Frank Russell who visited Pimeria in 1901-2,
students of the Pueblo Indians found some similarities in Pima culture.
However, since Russell does not know well about the Pueblo culture
and since at the time of Russell, systems of cultural relationship was
little
concerned by American anthropologists, the author does more extended
and comprehensive comparison based on her survey in 1926 and other’s
work including Russell’s.
First of all, she argues social organization of Pima and the Pueblo regarding to terminology.
The Pima kinship is reckoned through the fifth generation of both paternal
and maternal lines. Kinship terms are used through the fifth generation
and there is definite restriction of marriage within the fifth generation.
Despite of this, the author argues that there is no specific obligation
in either daily or customary life. The five clans system, which is
called "father
words" since a father is called by his name of clan he belongs
to, is existed among Pima. However, there is no regulation or functions
in
this system. The only thing that the author recognizes strong sense
of bondoness in Pima social organization is moiety. The five clans
belong
to either Coyote or Buzzard moiety and the author discovers the strong
self-consciousness of moiety among Pima. The author assesses that the
relatively weak bondness in Pima completely opposes to the Pueblo social organization which has strong
maternal exogamous clanship and moiety.
Secondly, she explores to the ceremonialism of Pima and the Pueblo. In here, she
finds some similarities between Pima and the Pueblo rituals like theories and concepts
of religion or magic. Both the pueblo and Pima believe that a disease
is caused and cured by same thing, and causer or curer is mainly thought
of the mammals, birds and insects. Moreover, the author inclines the
strong connections between Pima Navichu mask cult and the mask cults
of the Pueblo, Navaho and Apache.
However, she points out remarkable distinctions. For example, among the Pueblos,
where complex of societies and sacerdotal chieftaincies are existed,
there is fixed ceremonial calendar and all rituals are pervasive. On
the other hand, the Pima ritual is restricted and ceremonies are few
and not precisely dated. Moreover, although among Pima and the Pueblos,
there is existence of medicine men as curers and causes of diseases,
significant differences are recognized in details. From these facts,
the author concludes that it is too early to claim the relationship between
Pima and the Pueblos on
ceremonialism. Moreover, she proposes that the study of the similarities
between two cultures should be weighted truly in the integral setting.
Also, ceremonialsm of each culture in the Southwest scattered outside
of the separate culture but arranged distinctively. Therefore, she claims
to understand the essence of any single native culture, acquaintance
of the distribution of culture is required.
The author is succeeded to tell the complexity of single culture and
of the cultural diffusion by displaying scattering similarities and the
differences in two cultures.
CLARITY RANKING: 4
YUKIKO KASAHARA University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Parsons, Elsie Clews. The Laguna Migration
to Isleta. American Anthropologist 1928 Vol.30: 602-613.
In the late 1870's three Protestant white men married into the Laguna
clans of the American Southwest. The innovations they introduced into
Laguna society caused a schism among the Laguna. The more conservative
members of Laguna society left Laguna and moved to Mesita. From Mesita
a colony moved to Isleta. The Isletans convinced the Laguna to stay claiming
that the Lagunas would bring them good luck. Parsons' article deals with
the changes brought into both societies as each group adapted to the
other's presence. Parsons identified four main changes in their societies;
language adaptations, pottery techniques, social structure and ceremonial
practices.
There have been a number of marriages between the two groups, although
those of Laguna descent live in close proximity to each other. These
marriages are possible because the colonists and their families all become
bilingual. In contrast, the Isletans did not learn the language of their
immigrant neighbors.
Upon arriving at Isleta, Laguna pottery technology was more complex
than that of the Isletans. They taught their Isletan hosts their techniques,
although they have not learned the simpler ceramic tradition of the Isletans.
If Laguna potters need ceramics in the Isletan style then they purchase
it instead of learning the processes necessary for its production.
The third major aspect of social change is that Laguna social structure
has largely been abandoned in favor of the strong clan system of the
Islatans. This introduced endogamy among the Laguna, who traditionally
practiced exogamy. The introduction of the Isletans clan structure to
the Laguna also had the additional effect of weakening the moitey system
of the Isletans.
Finally, the ceremonial practices of the immigrants have also been retained
and introduced to the Isletans, expanding the religious ceremonial structure
of both groups.
These four areas were all backed up by ethnographic data, interviews
with members of both groups and personal observation. Parsons introduces
each social change and follows it with examples from the combined Laguna/Isleta
society. Her main downfall is that she does not define the majority of
her terms, assuming that the reader will be familiar with Pueblo cultures.
CLARITY: 2
CAMILLE LYNN JOLLEY Brigham Young University (Dr.
J. R. Hartley)
Parsons, Elsie Clews. The Laguna Migration to Isleta. American Anthropologist October, 1928 Vol. 30(4):602-613.
Elsie Clews Parsons assessed culture change for Laguna and Isletans
as these two cultures merged, following the Laguna migration to the Isletan
community. Laguna and Isleta were
Pueblo Indian groups in the American Southwest. In the 1870s, a rift occurred within Laguna
people when three Laguna women married Protestant white men. As a result, a large faction of the group
migrated eastward to Isleta around 1880 where they settled, persuaded
by Isletan offers of land in their community. Elsie
Clews Parsons examines the degree of assimilation of Laguna culture in
Isletan society in four areas: language, pottery, social organization,
and ceremonial practices. Her
visit to Isleta took place in the mid-1920s, some fifty years after the
migration.
Parsons notes that Isletans generally did not learn the language of
Laguna, Keresan. The only exceptions she observed were Isletans who married
Laguna. However, Laguna learned
to speak Isletan, but continued to speak Keresan to each other.
Laguna and Isletans had distinct pottery traditions. Laguna women practiced a more intricate style. Isletan
technique involved building and polishing, while Laguna tradition included
building, smoothing, painting, and burning. Isletan
potters readily accepted the more attractive Laguna tradition, enough
that Parsons encountered several Isletan potters who only produced Laguna
wares. Other potters continued to produce undecorated
Isletan wares.
Isletans admitted Laguna to their clans. Laguna
brought with them a strict matrilineal clan system and a two kiva moiety
system. On the other hand, Isletan
moiety system included the Winter and Summer people, who were further
divided between the seven groups of Corn peoples, all without strict
adherence to a clan ideal or matrilineal association. Isletans absorbed Laguna into their Corn
groups. Parsons contends also
that Laguna dropped their moiety system in favor of Isleta, as evidenced
by the absence of kivas built by Laguna in Isleta.
In ceremonial matters, Laguna brought strong influence to Isleta. Laguna retained many ceremonial dances, usually
performing after simple consultation with Isletan leaders. Isletans enjoyed the performances, and on
rare occasions an Isletan might join the dance. The most prominent area of Laguna influence
was in medicine. Two curing societies
emerged in Isleta, one lead by Laguna and the other by Isletans. In fact, Laguna medicine men trained Isletans
in their ways, and by the time of Parson's visit the 'Laguna' medicine
man was an Isletan.
Overall, Laguna cultural assimilation in Isleta was mixed. Laguna language and clan systems did not
integrate with Isletan culture to any appreciable extent. On the other hand, Laguna dance practices
were well accepted and Laguna pottery styles and medicine became regular
features in Isleta by 1928. Parsons’ study
manifests the dominant methodology of the day. Her work examines well-defined ethnic groups
with distinct cultural practices. The
frank description of culture practices gives the reader a clear picture
of the mixture of Laguna and Isletan ways.
CLARITY: 5
MATT FREEMAN University of
Southern Mississippi (Jeff Kaufmann)
Phillips, George Brinton. The Earliest Ornamental
Metal Work. American Anthropologist June-September, 1928 Vol. 30
(3): 465-469
The University of Pennsylvania discovered a row of metal bulls in the
ruins of Tell-el-Obeid, Chaldea at the
temple of the Babylonian goddess Ninkhursag. This was not only a significant
archeological discovery, but also one that led to the study of ancient
metallurgy, the study of metals.
The metal work dates back to about 4000 B.C., which shows that even
during that time people possessed considerable skill and knowledge
of metals. Four bulls were found measuring approximately 8 ½ inches tall
and 27 ½ inches, or about 2 feet long. The bodies were made of plates
of copper hammered over a carved wooden body. The hollow heads were
molded within metal casts. The heads and the bodies were connected
by a peg
in the head, with a thin plate of metal joining the two. The author
reasoned that the melted copper must have been poured out on a flat
stone and
then hammered thin with a heavy stone.
The next question was if the ancient metal workers knew of the alloy
bronze. Several scientists sampled the metals contained within the bulls
and provided their conclusions. The first analysis stated that it was
85 % copper, the second stated it was 95% copper, and the final analysis
stated that it was 95.62 % copper. The scientists concluded that the
ancient peoples were unaware of the brass alloy and simply used copper
in their metal works.
The author next questioned the use of the word brass, stated in the
Old Testament. He wondered if ancient peoples used the alloy brass as
we know it today, a combination of copper, zinc, lead, and other metals.
The director of the British Museum in London told
the author that he had heard of no such works of prehistoric brass.
The author then noted that had there been such brass works during that
ancient
period, they must have surely been discovered alongside the bulls.
The author concluded that the translated word "brass" could only
refer to copper. He later acquired knowledge that there was brass found
in coins in the third century A.D., but that the alloy was not scientifically
measured but rather used because of its durability. The author’s final
conclusion stated that copper objects were in fact made of native copper
or copper reduced from pure ores and not bronze as was sometimes reported.
CLARITY RANKING: 2
ADRIENNE WOOLLEY Brigham Young University (Julie
Hartley)
Phillips, George Brinton. The Earliest Ornamental
Metal Work. American Anthropologist, 1928 Vol. 30; .465-469.
This article argues how advanced knowledge and skills people of Stone
Age had on metal working by analyzing a metal frieze of bulls which discovered
at Tell-el Obeid, Chaldea. This ornament
dates back to about 4000 B.C, and the ruins where this metal work was
discovered were in the temple built during 1st dynasty of Ur or around 4300 B.C, which is 3rd dynasty
from Babylonian tradition. The author claims that the metal workers of
coppers must have wide knowledge of ores and smelting.
From the analysis of this metal frieze, two things associated with ancient
metallurgy were discovered. First, the author discussed the skill in
metallurgy from the observation of this ornament. The bodies of the
bull are made of metal plates, and its head is cast figure of copper.
The
bodies and a head are joined with a thin plate which was hammered down,
and nailed. The author claims that the ability of making metal plate
and cast heads requires remarkable knowledge and experience. Secondly,
several metal assays evidenced that these metal plates consist of large
amount of copper but not metal. Although in the Old Testament, a statement
mentions about "brass" and "Iron," the author estimates
that during this time, "brass" only referred to coppers.
Detailed analysis of ancient ornament successfully gives a clear argument
and indicates his intentions of this article which are to prove developed
civilization of the Sumerians and to motivate archeologists’ interests
on ancient metal works.
CLARITY RANKING: 3
YUKIKO KASAHARA University of British
Columbia (John Barker)
Radin, Paul. Ethnological Notes on the Ojibwa
of Southeastern Ontario. American
Anthropologist, 1928 Vol.30:659-
The following were written down by an Ojibwa Indian near Sarnia, Ontario.
They were transled by Mr. Edwin Maness. They have been edited by Chris
Vermillion, an anthropology student at Brigham Young University.
Childhood – Children are named by the elderly. The elderly receive
gifts when the child reaches one year of age.
Marriage – All people living around come to see a marriage. The
couple is married in a tent swinging from a tree. This occurs at
the time of the new moon.
Death – Widows or widowers mourn for a year and live with their
parents-in-law. A person’s belongings are buried along with them.
Medicines – A man gets up early in the morning when he goes out
to seek medicine. He gathers the medicine and uses it to cure the people.
The medicine has a variety of uses, meant to enhance social and other
skills.
Hunting – The hunter uses medicine when he hunts. When he kills
a deer, he offers the blood to the birds in all directions.
Fishing – Men fish at the time blueberries are ripe. They kill
many fish, which the people bring back.
Planting – The Indians plant corn, beans and squash. Men fish
and hunt and the women prepare the kill for use.
Fire Making – By using wood from a cedar and beech tree, and
Indian twirls the wood to make fire.
Travelling – An Indian throws tobacco into a lake before crossing
it. Before travelling in the winter, he prepares a tent. They keep warm
by fire. He hunts on ice by using deer shoulder blades attatched to his
feet to travel.
Swimming Bladders – An Indian uses life-savers from large fish
to float.
Preparation of Food – An Indian makes sugar using boiled sap.
He uses the stomach or bladder of an animal to cook food when he has
no kettle. Raccoons are boiled. Bread is made to rise without soda by
using certain snakes. Pounding mills are made from tree trunks, and used
to prepare corn flour, which is then made into soup.
Various uses of the Bear – Bears are used for their grease as well
as their hides and meat.
Making Clothes – Thread is made from elm bark. Needles are made
out of a bone from a deer’s leg.
Weather Prognostication – If the first thunderclap of the season
is followed by a great storm, the summer will be without famine or sickness.
Temperature can be foretold using the stars.
Flute Making – Flutes are made from red cedar wood.
How Relatives Behave – Relatives offer a symbol of their totem
when they are in need of clothes or food.
Sickness – When a man is sick, he hires a conjuror, who uses
a play involving animals to cure him.
Canoe Making – Canoes are made from birchbark and cedarbark.
Warpath – Those who know medicine eat a dog at the time of a
warpath. The brave men dance for ten days and eat a special soup. The
woman stay home and dance while waiting for their husbands.
|